Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Intro Physics Homework Help
Advanced Physics Homework Help
Precalculus Homework Help
Calculus Homework Help
Bio/Chem Homework Help
Engineering Homework Help
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Homework Help
Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Alternative Methods vs Iterative Design — Control Theory
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="ltkach2015, post: 5433767, member: 520445"] [B]QUESTION (2/2) 1)[/B] What are some alternatives to iterative design in control theory? [B] 2)[/B] I have a certain plant transfer function PTF(s) that is higher order than two and non-unity numerator. I want certain characteristics such as a certain damping ratio (zeta). So I want approximate it as second order (specially second order underdamped approximation) I introduce controller whose transfer function is K(s) in the feed-foward direction, and a unity gain in (-) feedback PTF(s) has open loop zeros which will become closed loop zeros (and a part of the denominator of the closed loop transfer function). So, I want to cancel the closed loop zeros with the higher order closed loop poles. I impose the "Angle Design Criteria" in-conjuction with the second order approximation constraint, therefore I determine that the system would need a phase lead angle (e.g. -75.89 degrees) This implies that the difference of controller's pole angles and zero angles is negative. There must exist either only: one zero and no poles, or some combination that yields a negative angle. So I introduce lag compensator which will increase the order of my system and introduce another closed loop zero [U]case1)[/U] K(s) = (s+z1); no poles, so I using angle criteria I can determine the zero location or [U]case2)[/U] K(s) = (s+z2)/(s+p2); I set the zero [U]arbitrarily,[/U] and determine pole location from angle criteria So my OLTF = K(s)*PTF(s); (OLTF denotes open loop transfer function) both cases may not satisfy the second order approximation constraints. [B]How can I analytically solve for pole and zero location that satisfy angle criteria and second order approximation constraints? (given the compensator chosen) Thank you.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Homework Help
Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Alternative Methods vs Iterative Design — Control Theory
Back
Top