Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Americans are genetically superior to all others.

  1. Jul 15, 2003 #1
    No other country has the same level of variety in its gene pool than America. Variety in the gene pool is important for increasing the odds of survival against genetic defect. Therefore, I assert that as a whole, Americans are genetically superior to all others.

    eNtRopY
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 15, 2003 #2
    'muhricans have the greatest variety? Hmm. Is there a ranking? What about Brazil? Or south africa?
     
  4. Jul 15, 2003 #3
    I presume this is a joke. Reading it out of context (if there is a context) I give it a 2/10.
     
  5. Jul 15, 2003 #4
    It's not a joke. It's a reality you can't deny.

    Do some research on the people of Ireland. You will see that their relatively small gene pool has led to larger numbers of genetic defects per populace than normal. This situation is also readily observed in small communities that do not allow breeding with outsiders... such as the Amish.

    Most Americans do not descend from a single ethnic group. Therefore, I propose that the average American has more genetic variety than the average person from almost all (if not all) other countries.

    eNtRopY
     
  6. Jul 15, 2003 #5
    Well first of all I don't believe there is any such thing as an "American gene-pool" since America is not a sexually isolated population. Second of all I don't believe that America is the most genetically varied population. I would say that accolade would go to Greater Europe.
     
  7. Jul 15, 2003 #6
    I agree, we are superior

    Although, I have noticed, that we are not the most attractive. We have a lot of attractive people, but 'pure-breads' seem to be on a higher level of 'beautiful' than we are.
     
  8. Jul 16, 2003 #7

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    MONGRELS RULE!
     
  9. Jul 16, 2003 #8

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    First look at the demographics and then say something Entropy! Pfff, for your information: a detailed study showed that people in the Netherlands are the healthiest and I am very sure that the US is somewhere down in no 20.
     
  10. Jul 16, 2003 #9
    I think Andorra use to have the longest life expectancy. It was like an avg 94 years for men and women if I remember correctly. That may not be true now, however. But even with that America being 5% (291 million / 6.2 billion) of the world's population owning 1/4 ($10 trillion / $40 trillion) of the wealth is definitely the richest.
     
  11. Jul 16, 2003 #10

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Maybe the richest, but the healthcare providing is quite bad. If I am correct, Norway has the best system for healthcare.. Scandanavian Healthcare tends to be provided by the government. I thougth that the Japanese lived the longest..

    The United States is over-industrialized, which is a source of a lot of diseases. I don't think the country is old enough yet to make a homogeneous 'healthy' gene-pool. Still only a very small percentage of marriages in inter-racial.

    And btw, Belgium was no. 2 on the list of countries with the healthiest people (overall taken), and guess what: belgians came from the dutch (with some admixture). *proud* And something else: dutch people are the tallest in the world, which is also a good indicator of good nutrition.

    And talking about isolated populations with a limited gene-pool: that certainly doesn't mean that those populations are diseased populations. I myself study a disease in the Finnish population so I know quite a lot about population genetics. There ARE about 30 genetic diseases that have a very high prevelance in Finland and are virtually non-existent in other populations.. But this is balanced by the fact that other genetic disorders are not present in Finland, like cystic fibrosis for instance. This is called genetic drift. Some diseases will be enriched and others will disappear. Only in the situation that you have got direct inbreeding within the first or second degree that you would get a diseased population.

    We aren't as similar to eachother as you might think we are Entropy, so I really really doubt that the states is a genetically privaledged society.
     
  12. Jul 16, 2003 #11
    WHen was this? I think Japan has the highest life expentancy but I haven't kept up with current trends.

    A little off topic but you could reduce that to 1/5 :smile:
     
  13. Jul 16, 2003 #12
    The only reason Americans do not have a longer life expectancy is because of the high costs of quality food and health care in America. My point is that statisically, Americans should be less prone to genetic disorder (i.e. birth defects, retardation, etc) than any other group of people.

    eNtRopY
     
  14. Jul 16, 2003 #13

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Funny, because that is exactly what I said in my post, so it must be true :P I work with two Japanese and they agree :D


    And Entropy, quality food is not expensive AT ALL! It is just that the junk food is so CHEAP! A big difference there. Life in Europe is WAAAYY more expensive than life in the US, I think that Americans have a lot more money to spent than other populations, but they are kind of taken over by this whole pop-culture thing where everything has to be fast and easy?

    And I stay by my point that the term genetic term American person is non-existent. Just what percentage of the European population is affected by these very rare recessive disorders? Does a Fin marying a Parisian really make a difference compared to a Fin from Helsinki compared to a Fin from Kuopio? I don't think so, I think they are equally as different. If you can, look up some articles from Leena Peltonen, eastern and western finland by themselves are very homogeneous populations, but when you compare the two they are very different.

    I still don't quite understand why Americans like using the terms African American and Caucasian, first of all: Caucasians can come from Africa, second of all, people from Africa compared to Europeans are equally different compared to someone from Spain and Finland. I was even surprised that Saudi Arabian people and people from India are also classified as Caucasian.
     
  15. Jul 16, 2003 #14
    Yes, that came as a shock to me as well when I first read it.
     
  16. Jul 16, 2003 #15

    Monique

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Caucasian according to the american heritage dictionary:

    SYLLABICATION: Cau·ca·sian

    PRONUNCIATION: kô-kzhn, -kzhn

    ADJECTIVE:
    1. Anthropology Of or being a major human racial classification traditionally distinguished by physical characteristics such as very light to brown skin pigmentation and straight to wavy or curly hair, and including peoples indigenous to Europe, northern Africa, western Asia, and India. No longer in scientific use. See Usage Note at race1.
    2. Of or relating to the Caucasus region or its peoples, languages, or cultures.
    3. Of or relating to a group of three language families spoken in the region of the Caucasus mountains, including Chechen, Abkhaz, and the Kartvelian languages.

    NOUN:
    1. Anthropology A member of the Caucasian racial classification. Not in scientific use.
    2. A native or inhabitant of the Caucasus.
    3. The Caucasian language family.


    Especially noteworthy: the term is still used daily in scientific populations to genetically distinguish a 'caucasian' and 'african american' group.
     
  17. Jul 16, 2003 #16
    How about this? A Dutch person from Utrecht marries his high school sweetheart (also from Utrecht), and these two people produce offspring. Now, a Dutch person from the same town emmigrates to America, marries a person whose ancestory is English, and also produces offspring. You tell me which children will have more genetic variety.

    eNtRopY
     
  18. Jul 16, 2003 #17

    iansmith

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    what about Canadian Entropy? I think we are more diverse than then the USA. We got Btritish, Irish, Stochttish, English, French, Western Europe and Native Ameriquan Blood. I think we have more diversity than you guys. Also we have some black blood you did wan't during the revolution.

    I think Canada has the greatest diversity!!!!
     
  19. Jul 16, 2003 #18
    You've got to be kidding me. Are you saying America has no blacks? Have you actually been to America? Trust me, we have more diversity than anyone including Canada.

    eNtRopY
     
  20. Jul 16, 2003 #19

    Another God

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member

    well, Australia... is Australia.. and we rock.....so ner.
     
  21. Jul 17, 2003 #20

    iansmith

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I've been to the states. I'm not saying that American do not have black. I think you're just full of your self:wink:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?