Exploring Ampere's Law: Understanding External Currents

  • Thread starter cupid.callin
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ampere Law
In summary, Ampere's law relies on what you define to be your curve of integration. This law states that the closed-loop integral over a given curve is proportional to the net current ENCLOSED by said loop. If you apply this law to the situation in B where there are 2 wires but only one is enclosed by your curve of integration, you get the same answer as in A. However, if you ignore the external current, you get a different answer.
  • #1
cupid.callin
1,132
1
In ampere circuital law, ∫B.dl = μo inet
i includes current "only passing through the loop "

also B is the net mag field at any point "all to any current anywhere"

now look at the pic.

In A, it is very easy to find field using ampere law ... its μi/2πr

Also if in B is you apply the law, B is again μi/2πr ... how is this possible
its like the external current doesn't make any difference!

Plz explain me this !
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 384
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ampere's law relies on what you define to be your curve of integration. Ampere's law states that the closed-loop integral [itex] Bdl [/itex] over a given curve is proportional to the net current ENCLOSED by said loop.

In A you only have 1 wire enclosed by your curve of integration (red circle). In B, yes there are 2 wires, but only one is enclosed by your curve of integration, thus the same answer as in A.
 
  • #3
Clever-Name said:
Ampere's law relies on what you define to be your curve of integration. Ampere's law states that the closed-loop integral [itex] Bdl [/itex] over a given curve is proportional to the net current ENCLOSED by said loop.

In A you only have 1 wire enclosed by your curve of integration (red circle). In B, yes there are 2 wires, but only one is enclosed by your curve of integration, thus the same answer as in A.

So you are saying that i studied it wrong that in [tex]Bdl[/tex] B is not due to all the currents existing in space?
 
  • #4
cupid.callin said:
So you are saying that i studied it wrong that in [tex]Bdl[/tex] B is not due to all the currents existing in space?
No, no, you are correct. B is due to the combined effect from all the currents.

cupid.callin said:
Also if in B is you apply the law, B is again μi/2πr ... how is this possible
its like the external current doesn't make any difference!
The integral [tex]\oint \vec{B} \cdot \vec{dl}[/tex] gives the same result, but you cannot pull [tex]|\vec{B}|[/tex] out like that because it is not constant in this case, unlike in the first!
 
  • #5
Oh yes! you are right!

How can i ignore that thing !

Dumb of me !

Thanks a lot Fightfish !
 

1. What is Ampere's Law?

Ampere's Law is a fundamental law of electromagnetism that describes the relationship between electric currents and the magnetic field they produce.

2. How does Ampere's Law relate to external currents?

Ampere's Law states that the magnetic field around a closed loop is directly proportional to the current passing through the loop. External currents refer to any currents outside of the closed loop, and they can affect the magnetic field produced by the loop.

3. What is the significance of understanding external currents in relation to Ampere's Law?

Understanding external currents is important because they can alter the magnetic field produced by a closed loop, which can have implications for various applications such as electromagnetic induction and designing electromagnets.

4. How can Ampere's Law be used to calculate the magnetic field produced by external currents?

Ampere's Law can be used in conjunction with other equations and principles, such as the Biot-Savart Law, to calculate the magnetic field produced by external currents. By considering the direction and magnitude of the external currents, the resulting magnetic field can be determined.

5. Are there any limitations to Ampere's Law in understanding external currents?

While Ampere's Law is a powerful tool for understanding the relationship between currents and magnetic fields, it does have limitations. For example, it assumes that the magnetic field is static and does not take into account any changing electric fields or the effects of special relativity.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
620
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
946
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
927
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
208
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
673
Replies
1
Views
769
Back
Top