1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

An AC-circuit

  1. Nov 23, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Hi all.

    Please take a look at the attachted circuit.

    I have found the following expression for the complex current in the resistor (the hat indicates that it is complex):

    \widehat_{I (t)} = \frac{{\omega ^2 LC {\widehat{U_0} }}}{{\omega ^2 LRC + i\omega L - R}}\exp ( - i\omega t),
    where U_0 is the amplitude of U(t), and the hat indicates that it is complex.

    Now I wish to find the real current, and I want to write it as:
    I(t) = I_0\cos(\omega t + \phi).

    But how do I do this? I have spent like 2 hours trying, but I don't know how to rewrite the complex amplitude of the current to have a phase.

    Thanks in advance.


    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 23, 2008 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Hi Niles! :smile:

    (have an omega: ω and a phi: φ :wink:)

    The standard way would be to write the left bit as A + iB (multiply top-and-bottom by the complex conjugate of the bottom), and then

    Re(A + iB)eiωt = Re(A + iB)(cosωt + isinωt)

    = Acosωt - Bsinωt,

    which maybe you know how to rewrite as Ccos(ωt + φ) ? :wink:
  4. Nov 23, 2008 #3
    Ok, so you are telling me to multiply the first term on the RHS with the complex conjugate and then take the square root. Thus I get the amplitude of the current, and now we have to multiply that with exp(iφ).

    But this gives me: ... * exp(-i(ωt-φ))? Don't we want a plus instead?

    And thanks for replying!
  5. Nov 23, 2008 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Why are you taking the square root? :confused:

    (And you did multiply top and bottom, didn't you? To get a complex over a real?)

    Anyway, you don't multiply the amplitude with exp(iφ) …

    you can't find the amplitude (or the phase) until you've got the whole function …

    in other words, until after you multiply. :smile:
  6. Nov 23, 2008 #5
    Ok, so what I do is:

    1) Multiply the first term on the RHS with the complex conjugate of the denominator.

    2) I find the phase, and write the first term as: z = |z|*exp(iφ).

    3) Find the real part, and all ...

    4) Done? If yes, then I will go to bed.

    EDIT: Can you confirm me in that -0.1 * 2*Pi radians is equal to 2*Pi - 0.1 * 2*Pi radians?
  7. Nov 23, 2008 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I'm not convinced that you've got it.

    You're given (K + iL)/(M + iN) times eiωt

    that's (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M + iN)(M - iN) times eiωt

    = (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M2 + N2) times eiωt

    the bottom is real, so the whole of the left can now easily be put in the form A + iB …

    go on from there.
    Yes, adding multiples of 2π to the phase makes no difference … e2πi = 1

    … so if your result comes out as more than 2π, just subtract 2π (or 4π or … ) :smile:
  8. Nov 23, 2008 #7
    And then I write z = A + iB as z = |z|e, right?
  9. Nov 23, 2008 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper


    ooh, I misunderstood what you wrote earlier …

    even though it was clear :rolleyes:
    Yes, that's right … then the real current will be the real part of |z|*exp(-iωt + iφ), = |z|*cos(-ωt + φ)

    To answer a previous point, cos(x) = cos(-x), so the minus sign doesn't matter (though it will mess up the sign of φ). :smile:

    Ignore some of my previous comments. :redface:
  10. Nov 24, 2008 #9
    Re: sorry!

    Nono, they were all good. Thanks for helping me - I see it much clearer now!

  11. Nov 24, 2008 #10
    I have found the phase φ to be -0.63, which is equivalent of 5.65. Does this mean that I am allowed to write:

    I(t) = Re [|z|*exp(-iωt - 0.63i)] = Re [|z|*exp(-i(ωt + 0.63)] = |z|*cos(ωt + 0.63),

    where Re [..] denotes the real part of the argument "...".
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2008
  12. Nov 24, 2008 #11


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yup! :biggrin:
  13. Nov 24, 2008 #12
    Great! Thanks!

    Just one last thing: Is it correct that sometimes the expressions for the current are very nasty? I mean, they are sometimes quite long :uhh:
  14. Nov 24, 2008 #13


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    oooh … dunno! :redface:

    i never did current 'n' stuff …

    i just know about the maths bit! :smile:
  15. Nov 24, 2008 #14
    Ahh, I see.

    But thanks anyway!
  16. Nov 24, 2008 #15
    Hah, yes.

    Consider a serial RCL circuit, that is, a voltage source connected to a condensator, a loop and a resistor. Let's say the Resistor is 200 ohm, the loop is 1 millihenry and the condensator is 20 nanofahrad. If you apply a simple voltage, not even timevariable, of 10 volt to this system, the current will look like this:


    (this assumes i(0)=0 and i'(0)=10000)

    If, instead, you apply an AC source, the voltage function (again assuming i(0)=0 but i'(0)=2*10^9) of which being v(t)=10*sin(20000*t), the resulting current function looks like this:

    i(t) = (1/20)*e^(-100000*t)*sin(200000*t)+B*sin(200000*t)+A*cos(200000*t).

    Explaining why this is so takes about two full pages.
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 24, 2008
  17. Nov 25, 2008 #16
    Oh, I forgot to substitute the variables. A=1/85 and B=4/85
  18. Nov 25, 2008 #17
    I am familiar with Kirchhoff's laws (I guess that's what you are referring to?), and I used them to find my expression.

    But I guess I should stop fearing long expressions :smile:
  19. Nov 25, 2008 #18
    Nah, it's



    L=1 milliHenry, R=200 ohm and C=20 nanofahrad.
    Applying 10 volt (DC) to this system gets you

    0.001*i'' + 200*i' + 5*10^7*i = 0.

    Solving this equation:

    0.001*y^2 + 200*y + 50000000 = 0

    gives you two imaginary numbers,

    y1=100000 + j*200000
    y2=100000 - j*200000

    which means that

    i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*( A*sin(200000*t) + B*cos(200000*t) ).

    (This is the general solution to the "ordinary differential equation" shown above.)

    To find A and B, you need to know some starting conditions. We know i(0)=0 because the loop has "infinite resistance*" when you apply the initial potential.

    Knowing that i(0)=0 means you can rewrite, so:

    i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*( A*sin(200000*t) + B*cos(200000*t) )
    i(0) = e^(0)*(A*sin(0) + B*cos(0))
    0 = A*sin(0)+B*cos(0)
    0 = B*1

    so you can simplify the initial expression for the current to

    i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*A*sin(200000*t)

    from elsewhere (and I honestly can't remember) we know that i'(0)=10000, so A can be isolated and determined. I don't want to write out di/dt here because it is a damn long function, but suffice to say, it turns out A = 0.05 so

    i(t) = 0.05*sin(200000*t)*e^(-100000*t)

    All in all, current determination becomes complicated once you have a lot of loops and capacitors, but not so difficult that you should feel discouraged - there are a lot of shortcuts and neat tools at your disposal if you ever start in on the subject in a serious manner.

    *not true
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: An AC-circuit
  1. Ac circuit & Power (I) (Replies: 6)

  2. Ac R-C circuit (Replies: 0)