Is 73+47 Really Equal to 5? The Answer May Surprise You!

  • Thread starter Archosaur
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Calculation
In summary, one user claims to have discovered that 73+47=5 through precise calculations and stands by their conclusion. Others question the significance of this equality and the user explains that the difference between 73 and 47 is a special integer squeezed between a square and a cube. The user also apologizes for attempting to deceive others with the equation. Some users suggest posting the equation on forums outside of mathematics for a bigger reaction. The discussion also touches on the use of "!" for factorials and its popularity in the United States.
  • #1
Archosaur
331
1
Guess what! Through complete and precise calculations, I have discovered that 73+47=5! Isn't that crazy? I stand firm by my conclusion and beseech anyone to challenge me!

I'm actually serious, by the way. I know how some of you might take this, but I'm not lying.

I would bet my life on the truthfulness of that equality.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not going to check your calculation right now but if it is true then why is it significant?
 
  • #3
Archosaur said:
I would bet my life on the truthfulness of that equality.

Well of course it's true... but, what is the point of your thread?
 
  • #4
Even better, did you know that 2=2!
I think that is pretty amazing..
 
  • #5
cristo said:
Well of course it's true... but, what is the point of your thread?

For a few seconds there I had to think about this also... The equality isn't simple enough at first glance to be another one of "those" threads.
 
  • #6
Mentallic said:
For a few seconds there I had to think about this also... The equality isn't simple enough at first glance to be another one of "those" threads.
What is not simple? Pick any integer, take its factorial and you can always find two numbers that add up to it.

Archosaur, it is also true that 55+ 65= 5! or the 23+ 97= 5!. What is special about 73 and 47?
 
  • #7
HallsofIvy said:
What is not simple? Pick any integer, take its factorial and you can always find two numbers that add up to it.

Archosaur, it is also true that 55+ 65= 5! or the 23+ 97= 5!. What is special about 73 and 47?

You really are uninsightful today, Halls!

First off, 73 and 47 are PRIMES, but even more amazing, their difference is the only integer that is squeezed in between a cube and a square, as Ramanujan proved!
 
  • #8
HallsofIvy said:
What is not simple? Pick any integer, take its factorial and you can always find two numbers that add up to it.

Archosaur, it is also true that 55+ 65= 5! or the 23+ 97= 5!. What is special about 73 and 47?

arildno (post#4) has given us a special equality, which happens to be very simple. (I wouldn't stop twice to think about its elegance).

Arildno, if this equality has some special features as you have stated, please explain in a little more detail what 'an integer squeezed between a square and a cube' means :smile:
 
  • #9
25= 5 squared; 27=3 cubed. so the difference between them is one less than a cube and one more than a square.
Is it really that amazing that they're both primes? Goldbach's conjecture has been numerically verified for every number up to the order of 10^18 (according to wikipedia!). 5! is an even number...
 
  • #10
I have just checked "the penguin dictionary of curious and interesting numbers author David Wells" and 120 appears there.It is the 15th triangular number the 8th tetrahedral number,the list goes on.
 
  • #11
Okay okay okay, so you knew the trick right away...

I knew I should have posted this in the physics section...

See? You were supposed to think that I was just exclaiming that 73+47=5, but you all immediately identified the factorial. I'll go find some history majors to try it on.

And yes, 73 and 47 are special, kinda. Firstly, they were the first prime numbers that came to my head that add to 120, but then I noticed that they are the 20th and 15th primes, respectively and 20-15 is 5, which is the number that I took the factorial of.

Anyway, sorry for the attempted deception :)
 
  • #12
Archosaur said:
Okay okay okay, so you knew the trick right away...

I knew I should have posted this in the physics section...

No.. you should have posted this in the general discussion section, or better still not posted it at all. :uhh:
 
  • #13
Archosaur said:
Okay okay okay, so you knew the trick right away...

I knew I should have posted this in the physics section...

See? You were supposed to think that I was just exclaiming that 73+47=5, but you all immediately identified the factorial. I'll go find some history majors to try it on.

And yes, 73 and 47 are special, kinda. Firstly, they were the first prime numbers that came to my head that add to 120, but then I noticed that they are the 20th and 15th primes, respectively and 20-15 is 5, which is the number that I took the factorial of.

Anyway, sorry for the attempted deception :)

You should try it on forums devoted to social "sciences", or for nurses, or for primary school teachers and suchlike. I'm sure there will be much flutter and chatter over your problem in such places.
 
  • #14
If the postfix factorial notation is not interpreted as a punctuation mark then your sentence is a grammatical failure. It would be nice if you could sneak some punctuation into the original joke to overcome this flaw.
 
  • #15
Archosaur said:
See? You were supposed to think that I was just exclaiming that 73+47=5, but you all immediately identified the factorial. I'll go find some history majors to try it on.

Why? To give a brilliant demonstration of smart-assedness?

The fact that you know "!" can be interpreted as a mathematical operator doesn't make you smarter than those who don't. Which is pretty obvious given that very few would be impressed by remarking that "73+47=120" or "73+47=2*3*4*5"
 
  • #16
alxm said:
The fact that you know "!" can be interpreted as a mathematical operator doesn't make you smarter than those who don't.

(1) The exclamation point for factorials has been used for over 200 years, and in the US it is generally taught in middle school.

(2) There are dozens of riddles of this type that have to do with obscure meanings of words, whereas "!" for factorial is the secondary usage that most pople will think of if pressed.
 
  • #17
confinement said:
If the postfix factorial notation is not interpreted as a punctuation mark then your sentence is a grammatical failure. It would be nice if you could sneak some punctuation into the original joke to overcome this flaw.

Haha, yes I did notice that. I thought about sneaking a period in after the "!", but that would make it even more obvious... Oh, I could write "...73+47=5!" and say that it's "73+47=5*4*3*2" and "!" which is still grammatically incorrect, but maybe it's closer.


alxm said:
Why? To give a brilliant demonstration of smart-assedness?

The fact that you know "!" can be interpreted as a mathematical operator doesn't make you smarter than those who don't. Which is pretty obvious given that very few would be impressed by remarking that "73+47=120" or "73+47=2*3*4*5"

Whoa dude. I'm just playing around. Of course that doesn't make me smarter and I never said it did. No need to go on the defensive. Lighten up a little.
 
  • #18
cristo said:
No.. you should have posted this in the general discussion section, or better still not posted it at all. :uhh:

at least you were nice about it...
 
  • #20
you guys need to do a better job at spotting trolls when you see them
 
  • #21
confinement said:
(1) The exclamation point for factorials has been used for over 200 years, and in the US it is generally taught in middle school.

And promptly forgotten. Most people don't know it or need to know it.

(2) There are dozens of riddles of this type that have to do with obscure meanings of words

So there are lots of stupid 'riddles'. And?
 
  • #22
Archosaur said:
Whoa dude. I'm just playing around. Of course that doesn't make me smarter and I never said it did. No need to go on the defensive. Lighten up a little.

No, but you made a lame joke, where the 'punchline' amounts to "Ha-ha, you don't know what a factorial sign is." and then implied you'd have more fun telling it to 'history majors'. I'm just telling you that that would be usually perceived as assholeish, elitist, behavior. Same goes for a history student trying to stump a physicist with an obscure history reference.
 
  • #23
qntty said:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Multifactorial.html

A lot of people would find that confusing because I would have thought ! would mean to apply the factorial operator twice. Post that on a computer science form and you'll stump a lot of people.
 

1. Is 73+47 really equal to 5?

No, 73+47 is not equal to 5. The correct answer is 120.

2. Why does the title say "The Answer May Surprise You!" if the answer is not 5?

The title is meant to be attention-grabbing and thought-provoking. The answer may surprise some people who are not familiar with mathematical operations or have not carefully read the question.

3. How was the number 5 chosen for the title of this question?

The number 5 was chosen as a way to pique curiosity and draw attention to the question. It is a small and seemingly insignificant number when compared to 73 and 47, making it an unexpected answer that may surprise readers.

4. Is there any mathematical operation or context in which 73+47 could equal 5?

No, there is no mathematical operation or context in which 73+47 could equal 5. The only way to obtain the answer of 5 is by misreading the question or making a mistake in calculation.

5. Why is it important to pay attention to details in scientific questions and answers?

In science, accuracy and precision are crucial. Paying attention to details ensures that the information and findings presented are reliable and credible. It also helps avoid false conclusions and promotes a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

Similar threads

Challenge Math Challenge - December 2021
    • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
93
Views
10K
Challenge Math Challenge - May 2019
    • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
Seeking psychological help: Tricks to deal with being really envious?
    • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
712
Music My daughter's first music single....'Confined'
    • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Boltzmann distribution and the number of molecules with a certain velocity
    • Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
A Is "Equal a priori Probabilities" the correct scientific approach?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Should the public know what you are thinking and concluding?
    • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
How to calculate the solid angle subtended by an off axis disk
    • General Math
Replies
8
Views
9K
Challenge Math Challenge - February 2019
    • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
86
Views
19K
How can I approximate a data set with an exponential curve?
    • General Math
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top