1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

AN EM field vs THE EM field

  1. Sep 21, 2011 #1
    When I studied EM we always treated EM fields as being "individual" autonomous fields generated either from the separation of charges or induced by other phenomena. However, I'm reading that modern physics is treating the zero-point energy as fluctuations in THE EM field. Susskind clearly states that this EM field exists absent any charges, and is simple a characteristic of empty space.

    Am I missing something here?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2011 #2

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    I think you are reading way too much into a preposition. It is possible to have electric and magnetic fields in the absence of charges. These are known as vacuum solutions to Maxwells equations, and take the form of EM waves. Whether you use one preposition for vacuum solutions and another preposition for non-vacuum solutions is not terribly important.
     
  4. Sep 22, 2011 #3

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Even in classical physics there's one and only one electromagnetic field (according to Maxwell's theory as a classical relativistic field theory). This field can have many specific forms dependent on the charges and currents.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: AN EM field vs THE EM field
  1. EM fields and energy (Replies: 2)

  2. EM field lagrangian (Replies: 5)

  3. Momentum in EM Field (Replies: 3)

Loading...