An integral equation Abel and L operator?

In summary: Delta v(\rho_{,}\phi)\right]_{0}^{t}-\intop_{0}^{t}\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\right)\Delta v(\rho_{,}\phi)\end{gathered}\end{gathered}Note that the first term in the square brackets is equal to zero due to the property of the \mathcal{L} operator. Therefore, we can simplify the above expression to\begin{gathered}\intop_{y}^{a}\dfrac{dt}{\sqrt{t^{2}-y^{2}}}\
  • #1
jarvisyang
5
0
an integral equation Abel and L operator??

1. The Abel operator
The general Abel integral equation
[tex]
\begin{gathered}\intop_{x}^{a}\dfrac{F(y)dy}{\left(y^{2}-x^{2}\right)^{\frac{1+u}{2}}}=f(x)\end{gathered}
[/tex]
has the solution
[tex]
\begin{gathered}F(r)=-\dfrac{2\cos\frac{\pi u}{2}}{\pi}\dfrac{d}{dr}\intop_{r}^{a}\dfrac{f(x)xdx}{\left(x^{2}-r^{2}\right)^{\frac{1-u}{2}}}\end{gathered}
[/tex]
where [itex]\intop_{x}^{a}\frac{\left(\bullet\right)dy}{\left(y^{2}-x^{2}\right)^{\frac{1+u}{2}}}[/itex] is the well-known Abel operator
2. The [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] operator
The notation [itex]\lambda(k,\phi-\phi_{0})[/itex] is defined as follows:
[tex]\begin{gathered}\lambda(k,\phi-\phi_{0}):=\dfrac{1-k^{2}}{1-2k\cos(\phi-\phi_{0})+k^{2}}\end{gathered}
[/tex]
The [itex]\mathcal{L}[/itex] operator is defined as
[tex]\mathcal{L}(k)f(\phi)=\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\intop_{0}^{2\pi}\lambda(k,\phi-\phi_{0})f(\phi_{0})d\phi_{0}
[/tex]
Obviously, the following two properties for [itex] \mathcal{L} [/itex] operator are valid
[tex]
\begin{gathered}\mathcal{L}(k_{1})\mathcal{L}(k_{2})=\mathcal{L}(k_{1}k_{2})\\
\lim_{k\rightarrow1}\mathcal{L}(k)f=f
\end{gathered}
[/tex]
3. The question
Prove the following integral equation
[tex]
\begin{gathered}4\intop_{0}^{\rho}\dfrac{dx}{\sqrt{\rho^{2}-x^{2}}}\end{gathered}
\begin{gathered}\intop_{x}^{a}\dfrac{\rho_{0}d\rho_{0}}{\sqrt{\rho_{0}^{2}-x^{2}}}
\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho\rho_{0}}\right)\sigma(\rho_{0,}\phi)=v(\rho_{0,}\phi)
\end{gathered}
[/tex]
has the following solution
[tex]
\begin{gathered}\sigma(y,\phi)=\dfrac{1}{\pi^{2}}\left[\dfrac{\Phi(a,y,\phi)}{\sqrt{a^{2}-y^{2}}}-\intop_{y}^{a}\dfrac{dt}{\sqrt{t^{2}y^{2}}}\begin{gathered}\intop_{0}^{t}\dfrac{\rho d\rho}{\sqrt{t^{2}-\rho^{2}}}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\right)\Delta v(\rho_{,}\phi)\end{gathered}
\right]\end{gathered}
[/tex]
where
[tex]
\begin{gathered}\Phi(t,y,\phi):=\dfrac{1}{t}\intop_{0}^{t}\dfrac{\rho d\rho}{\sqrt{t^{2}-\rho^{2}}}\dfrac{d}{d\rho}\left[\rho\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\right)\Delta v(\rho_{,}\phi)\right]\end{gathered}
[/tex]
and [itex]\Delta[/itex] is the two-dimensional Laplace operator in polar coordinate, i.e.
[tex]
\begin{gathered}\Delta:=\dfrac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\rho^{2}}+\dfrac{1}{\rho^{2}}\dfrac{\partial^{2}}{\partial\phi^{2}}\end{gathered}
[/tex]
4.Hints
To prove the formulae, one may make full use of the two properties of [itex] \mathcal{L} [/itex] operator and the approach of integration by parts.
These are the hints in the book, but I still can not figure the final formulae out with the help of these hints. So I post it here and wait for your excellent proof.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for bringing up this interesting topic. The integral equation you are referring to is a special case of the general Abel integral equation, which is widely used in many fields of science such as physics, engineering, and mathematics. The Abel operator and the \mathcal{L} operator play important roles in solving this type of integral equations.

To prove the given formula, we will start by using the first property of the \mathcal{L} operator. We have

\begin{gathered}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho\rho_{0}}\right)\sigma(\rho_{0},\phi)=\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho\rho_{0}}\right)\intop_{\rho_{0}}^{a}\dfrac{\rho_{0}d\rho_{0}}{\sqrt{\rho_{0}^{2}-x^{2}}}
\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho\rho_{0}}\right)\sigma(\rho_{0,}\phi)=\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho}\right)\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho_{0}}\right)\sigma(\rho_{0},\phi)\end{gathered}

Using the second property of the \mathcal{L} operator, we can simplify this expression to

\begin{gathered}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{x^{2}}{\rho_{0}}\right)\sigma(\rho_{0},\phi)=\sigma(\rho_{0},\phi)\end{gathered}

Next, we will use integration by parts to simplify the given integral equation. We have

\begin{gathered}\intop_{y}^{a}\dfrac{dt}{\sqrt{t^{2}-y^{2}}}\begin{gathered}\intop_{0}^{t}\dfrac{\rho d\rho}{\sqrt{t^{2}-\rho^{2}}}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\right)\Delta v(\rho_{,}\phi)=\left[\dfrac{\rho y}{t^{2}}\mathcal{L}\left(\dfrac{\rho y}{t
 

1. What is an integral equation Abel and L operator?

An integral equation Abel and L operator is a mathematical tool used to solve integral equations, which are equations that involve an unknown function within an integral. The Abel operator is used to transform the integral equation into a functional equation, while the L operator is used to solve the functional equation.

2. How is an integral equation Abel and L operator useful?

An integral equation Abel and L operator is useful in various fields of science and engineering, such as physics, chemistry, and signal processing. It allows for the solution of complex integral equations that cannot be solved using traditional methods, making it a valuable tool in research and problem-solving.

3. What is the difference between an Abel operator and an L operator?

The Abel operator is used to transform an integral equation into a functional equation by changing the limits of integration. The L operator, on the other hand, is used to solve the resulting functional equation by inverting the operator and applying it to the known function. Essentially, the Abel operator sets up the problem, while the L operator solves it.

4. Can an integral equation Abel and L operator be used for any type of integral equation?

While the integral equation Abel and L operator is a powerful tool, it is not suitable for solving all types of integral equations. It is most commonly used for linear integral equations, and may not be effective for nonlinear or highly complex equations.

5. Are there any limitations to using an integral equation Abel and L operator?

One limitation of the integral equation Abel and L operator is that it may not always produce a unique solution. In some cases, there may be multiple solutions or no solution at all. Additionally, the operator may not be effective for solving integral equations with singularities or discontinuities.

Similar threads

  • Differential Equations
Replies
16
Views
876
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
857
  • Differential Equations
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
710
  • Differential Equations
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top