An odd sort of symmetry about E=MC^2

In summary, when mass moves faster, it gains kinetic energy which makes it seem more massive. This is due to the effects of force propagating at the speed of light and the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy.
  • #1
Dropout
53
0
You sacrifice mass to create energy (energy is just mass with a velocity), and the faster mass moves (relativity) the more massive the mass gets, is there some sort of significance to that? I hate riddles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The question is unclear.
 
  • #3
E=MC^2. Destroy mass, create energy. -1 mass +1 energy.

Lorenze Transformation equation. Faster you go (sacrificing energy, propulsion), the more massive mass gets. +1 mass -1 energy.
 
  • #4
*brainstorming, but getting absolutely nowhere* :yuck: :yuck: :yuck:
 
  • #5
Dropout said:
You sacrifice mass to create energy (energy is just mass with a velocity), and the faster mass moves (relativity) the more massive the mass gets, is there some sort of significance to that? I hate riddles.

An answer to you riddle.

Energy is force x distance. A stationary mass has rest mass and therefore rest energy. This rest mass used energy to create it - in its structure, force moved through a distance and is stored as potential energy (PE).
When this mass moves it gains kinetic energy (KE).

Now the faster mass moves the more massive it seems to get. Well this is not an increase in physical mass, but is an effect brought about by the effects of force propagating at the speed of light. It's a bit like pushing a child on a swing. As the child moves faster, your hand has less push effect because it moves at the same speed as the swing. This doesn't mean the child's mass has increased, it only means that the effect of the push weakens.

Also when particles change type, ie, big to small, the release of potential energy gives the smaller particle more speed (PE changes to KE).
 
Last edited:

1. What is the equation E=MC^2 and what does it mean?

E=MC^2 is the famous equation proposed by Albert Einstein in his Theory of Special Relativity. It states that energy (E) is equal to mass (M) multiplied by the speed of light (C) squared. This means that a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy, and vice versa.

2. Why is E=MC^2 considered to be a revolutionary equation?

E=MC^2 is considered revolutionary because it fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe and the relationship between energy and matter. It also laid the foundation for the development of nuclear energy and weapons.

3. How does E=MC^2 relate to the concept of symmetry?

In physics, symmetry refers to the balance or correspondence between different aspects of a system. E=MC^2 is considered to have an odd sort of symmetry because it shows that energy and mass are interchangeable and can be transformed into each other, without changing the overall value of the equation.

4. What are some real-life applications of E=MC^2?

E=MC^2 has many important applications in the fields of physics, engineering, and technology. It is the basis for nuclear energy, which is used to generate electricity in power plants. It also plays a crucial role in nuclear weapons and has been used in medical imaging techniques such as PET scans.

5. Is E=MC^2 the only equation that describes the relationship between energy and matter?

No, there are other equations that also describe the relationship between energy and matter, such as the equation for kinetic energy (E=1/2MV^2) and the equation for rest energy (E=MC^2). However, E=MC^2 is the most well-known and significant equation in this regard.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
760
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
634
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
125
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
62
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
871
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
124
Views
13K
Back
Top