Are Moments Treated Differently than Forces in Beam Analysis?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of summing up externally applied moments in the analysis of beam structures. It is explained that moments have qualities of a vector and must be considered in terms of their point of application and direction, rather than simply adding their magnitudes. An example is provided to further illustrate this point. It is also noted that moments can translate without affecting equilibrium, unlike forces, making them known as 'free vectors'. This property should be covered in introductory mechanics or statics courses.
  • #1
aerograce
64
1
I am always wondering, when we are analysing beam structure where many externally applied moments are added on, why we can sum up all the externally applied moments and write equilibrium equations according to that. Because these moments are actually along different axes. Is it because in analysing process, we treat all moments as couples? If that is the case, then in real life, is our analysing method inaccurate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, moments have qualities of a vector like forces do. When you say, '... sum up all the externally applied moments ...', you must pay attention to their point of application and their direction. You don't just add up their magnitudes.
 
  • #3
SteamKing said:
Well, moments have qualities of a vector like forces do. When you say, '... sum up all the externally applied moments ...', you must pay attention to their point of application and their direction. You don't just add up their magnitudes.

Its better to explain my point with one typical example in analysing a beam. You can view the attached file.

In the equation Mc(left)=0, it actually sums up the moments though they are along different axis.
 

Attachments

  • 2717.png
    2717.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 327
  • #4
I don't see your confusion. The reacting moment Ma and the applied couple at B are both acting about an axis coming out of the paper, even though they are applied at different points along the beam. Therefore, they can be combined by adding their magnitudes.
 
  • #5
SteamKing said:
I don't see your confusion. The reacting moment Ma and the applied couple at B are both acting about an axis coming out of the paper, even though they are applied at different points along the beam. Therefore, they can be combined by adding their magnitudes.

But their axes are actually not the same right? They are just parallel to each other. And also, why the moments applied won't affect the force equilibrium equations? Because if we don't assume moments as a couple, they will affect the net force on the system
 
  • #6
I think the point you are missing about moments is that, unlike forces, they can translate without affecting the equilibrium of the beam. Moments, or couples, are known as 'free vectors' because of this property.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couple_(mechanics)

This is a subtle, but important, characteristic which should be covered in any intro. mechanics or statics course.
 

1. What is beam structure analysis?

Beam structure analysis is a process of studying the behavior and characteristics of beams, which are structural elements used to support loads in buildings, bridges, and other structures. It involves using mathematical and physical principles to determine the internal forces, stresses, and deformations of the beam.

2. What are the types of beam structures?

The three main types of beam structures are simply supported, cantilever, and overhanging beams. Simply supported beams are supported at both ends and can freely rotate at the supports. Cantilever beams are supported at one end and fixed at the other, while overhanging beams have one or both ends extending beyond the supports.

3. How is beam structure analysis performed?

Beam structure analysis can be performed using various methods, such as hand calculations, computer-aided design (CAD) software, and finite element analysis (FEA). Hand calculations involve using equations and formulas to determine the internal forces and stresses in the beam. CAD software allows for a visual representation of the beam's behavior, while FEA uses numerical methods to solve for the internal forces and stresses.

4. What factors affect beam structure analysis?

The factors that can affect beam structure analysis include the type of beam, the material used, the loads applied, and the support conditions. Additionally, factors such as temperature changes, structural vibrations, and non-uniform loading can also impact the behavior of the beam.

5. Why is beam structure analysis important?

Beam structure analysis is important for ensuring the structural integrity and safety of buildings and structures. It helps engineers and designers determine the appropriate size, shape, and material for beams to withstand the expected loads and prevent failure or collapse. It also allows for the optimization of beam design to minimize costs and maximize efficiency.

Similar threads

Engineering Struggling with a Structural Analysis Problem?
    • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
863
Bending moments about two different axes
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
Quick return mechanism stress analysis
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
1K
Non-composite beam analysis
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
Moment in beam (caused by influence line)
    • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fixed-End Beam with Center Static Load
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
1K
Fatigue life of a simple beam
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
Buckling and modal FEA of a submarine structure
    • General Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
Confidence in FEA stress values?
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
Can a 25kN Force Affect the Moment at the Fixed Support in Beam Analysis?
    • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top