When considering a system of particles with respect to a fixed point O, then the total angular momentum around that point can be writtin as(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] \textbf{L}_O = \sum_i \textbf{r}_i\times m_i\textbf{v}_i [/tex]

However in my book they add and substract the vektor [itex] \sum_i \textbf{R}_{CM}\times m_i\textbf{v}_i [/itex], which gives,

[tex] \textbf{L}_O = \sum_i (\textbf{r}_i-\textbf{R}_{CM})\times m_i\textbf{v}_i + \sum_i \textbf{R}_{CM}\times m_i\textbf{v}_i[/tex]

It is then stated that the first term in the above equation, resembles the angular momentum around CM, and the second term "the angular momentum of CM", i.e.

[tex] \textbf{L}_O = \textbf{L}_{CM} + \textbf{R}_{CM}\times \textbf{P} [/tex]

I understand the second term, but the first term seems a little confusing. How can the 1st term be considered as the angular momentum around CM? Indeed the vector [itex] \textbf{r}_i -\textbf{R}_{CM} [/itex] points from CM to the particlei, but how about the velocity vector term [itex] \textbf{v}_i [/itex] of particleiin [itex] \textbf{L}_{CM} [/itex], doesn't that need to be the velocity of the particleirelative to the CM, before it can be considered as the angular momentum around CM?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Angular momentum around CM

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**