Angular Momentum Operator

  • #1
leviathanX777
42
0
The operators used for the x and y components of angular momentum are:

7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bz%7D%7D%20%20-%20z%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7By%7D%7D).jpg


7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bx%7D%7D%20%20-%20x%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%7D%7B%5Cpartial%7Bz%7D%7D).jpg


Show that Lx and Lz obey an uncertainty relation




2. No relevant equations.




The Attempt at a Solution



I'm going on that the assumption that if LxLy - LyLz does not equal zero then they don't commute and have an uncertainty relation. However I can only get this equal to zero and don't know how to show the uncertainty rrelation if I achieve one.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Plutoniummatt
46
0
I'm going on that the assumption that if LxLy - LyLz does not equal zero then they don't commute and have an uncertainty relation. However I can only get this equal to zero and don't know how to show the uncertainty rrelation if I achieve one.

if you mean:

[Lx, Ly] = LxLy - LyLx

then it does not equal to zero, angular moment is the cross product: r x p

so Lx = y.Pz - z.Py Ly = x.Pz - z.Px

where x and y and z are position operators and Px, Py and Pz are momentum operators, stick those into your commutator and try again, you should end up with

[Lx, Ly] = ihLz

where h is the reduced planck constant. and Lz is the Angular momentum operator for z axis
 
  • #3
vela
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
15,576
2,218
It would also help if you showed us your calculation of the commutator so we can see where your error is.
 
  • #4
leviathanX777
42
0
Ah I got it solved in the end. Just made a minor mistake. Thanks!
 

Suggested for: Angular Momentum Operator

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
564
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
497
Replies
21
Views
575
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
612
Replies
16
Views
768
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
605
Replies
9
Views
455
Top