Anitsymmetric tensor/switching indices problem

  • Thread starter wasia
  • Start date
  • #1
wasia
52
0
Let's say that some non-operator (having only numbers as it's components) tensor is antisymmetric:

[tex]\omega^{\sigma\nu}=-\omega^{\nu\sigma}[/tex]
and
[tex]\omega_{\sigma\nu}=-\omega_{\nu\sigma}[/tex],

however, I have read in the Srednicki book that it is incorrect to say that the same tensor with one index down and one up would be antisymmetric as well.

Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

[tex]\omega^{\nu}\,_{\sigma}=\omega^{\nu\beta}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}
[/tex]

Thank you.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
xboy
134
0
Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

[tex] -\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}
[/tex]

Shouldn't there be another step in between?
 
  • #3
Ben Niehoff
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,887
168
Could you please point out, where and what are the errors of the derivation? Should I read something before asking such questions? g here is the Minkowski metric:

[tex]\omega^{\nu}\,_{\sigma}=\omega^{\nu\beta}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega_{\sigma}\,^{\nu}
[/tex]

This should be fine. Notice that you switched which index was up and which was down.
 
  • #4
wasia
52
0
xboy, the steps in between might be something like
[tex]-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\beta\sigma}=-\omega^{\beta\nu}g_{\sigma\beta}=-g_{\sigma\beta}\omega^{\beta\nu}=-\omega_\sigma\,^\nu[/tex]
I assume they are valid, as g is undoubtly symmetric (at least in my case) and also g commutes with omega, as they contain only numbers.

Ben Niehoff, I do have noticed, that positions have changed.

However, if anyone could point out a mistake, or tell if that's correct, as Ben says, please do it.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
xboy
134
0
Walia, your derivation seems correct to me. I can't think of a case of your derivation being invalid except for the metric being non-symmetric. But I don't know if the metric can be non-symmetric at all.
 

Suggested for: Anitsymmetric tensor/switching indices problem

Replies
2
Views
640
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
502
  • Last Post
Replies
28
Views
733
Replies
2
Views
377
  • Last Post
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
534
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
630
Replies
19
Views
920
Replies
9
Views
729
Top