Annihilation Operator Hermitian?

  • Thread starter n0_3sc
  • Start date
  • #1
243
1

Homework Statement



How do I show that the annihilation operator [tex] \hat{a} [/tex] is hermitian WITHOUT explicitly using the condition where an operator X is hermitian if its adjoint is also X ie. [tex] X=X^+ [/tex]

Homework Equations



none.

The Attempt at a Solution



I could show [tex] \hat{a} \hat{x} \neq \hat{x} \hat{a} [/tex] where [tex] \hat{x} [/tex] is the position operator, but that only shows non-hermiticity for that one operator...
Is there a more elegant way to show non-hermiticity simply?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
Commuting with operators doesn't have much to do with hermiticity. In the last problem you posted you found an eigenstate of the 'a' operator. What were it's eigenvalues like? Hermitian operators have real eigenvalues.
 
  • #3
243
1
oh yes offcourse - the eigenvalue was real...stupid me. :biggrin:
 
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
The point is that the operator has eigenvalues that AREN'T real. Hope you misspoke.
 
  • #5
243
1
yeah sorry I was meant to say: "...the eigenvalues are meant to be real..."

And the question did give a complex eigenvalue...
 

Related Threads on Annihilation Operator Hermitian?

  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
Top