Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Another fallacy

  1. Jun 14, 2005 #1
    HI, since e^[i*pi]=-1,then e^[2i*pi]=1.
    taking lin of both sides,2*i*pi=0,that makes i=0
    squaring both sides,you get -1 to equal 0.
    Is there a problem with what i have done,and what is it?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 14, 2005 #2

    Curious3141

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    When complex outputs are allowed, logarithms become multivalued. In this case, the correct formulae are :

    [tex]e^{2k\pi i} = 1, \ln(1) = 2k\pi i[/tex] where [itex]k[/itex] ranges over the integers.

    In your case, you're confusing the result for k = 0 with k = 1, hence the apparent paradox.
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2005
  4. Jun 14, 2005 #3

    Zurtex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Yes and:

    [tex](-1)^2 = 1 \quad 1^2 = 1 \quad 1 = - 1 \quad 2 = 0[/tex]

    It's the same things really :rolleyes:
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Another fallacy
  1. 2 fallacies (Replies: 15)

  2. Where's the fallacy (Replies: 5)

Loading...