- #1
SGT
The gost in the restaurant:http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/09/08/national/a060604D48.DTL&hw=orlando+ghost&sn=001&sc=1000 [Broken]
Last edited by a moderator:
It is as believable as any other ghost story, but the funny thing about this one is that it has ended in a lawsuit.Evo said:gost? I thought you were making a statement. h key stuck?
:grumpy: I was commenting on your missing h's (or are they visible to everyone else)SGT said:It is as believable as any other ghost story, but the funny thing about this one is that it has ended in a lawsuit.
Evo said::grumpy: I was commenting on your missing h's (or are they visible to everyone else)
Tom Mattson said:Look at the thread title and at the opening post.
Tom Mattson said:Enjoy talking to yourself?
That's what I thought, but I couldn't see what the point was. Ok, I am only half crazy. :tongue2: (you missed an H) But if you fix it, I'll really sound nutty.Ivan Seeking said:Really though, I assumed that it was intentional since the title and the post have the same error.
Sounds like you buy lots of food for a person who's already died because of hunger!SGT said:All those posts because of a missing h! I will give you several ones: hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Lisa! said:Do you think I should post my ghosts story here? I even have some proof that they exist!
I'm a member of a forum and lots of ghosts post there. Some of them even talk to me and ask me questions :uhh: and whenever I look around I don't see any online member with that name but I see their posts! :uhh: :uhh:Ivan Seeking said:Please do. :tongue2:
I look forward to hearing them.matthyaouw said:It's like you're aware of their presence, but you can't see or hear them?
I've got a couple of ghost stories (albeit second hand ones) if anyone is interested.
Are you questioning the reason for the lawsuit? Or what? It is a fact in many cities, the buyer must be notified prior to a sale of a piece of property if it has a history of being haunted. What is your thoughts on this? I don't understand why the new buyer would not allow it to be exorcised by the church. Just because it is a different church than his? Makes no sense on his part.SGT said:The gost in the restaurant:http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/09/08/national/a060604D48.DTL&hw=orlando+ghost&sn=001&sc=1000 [Broken]
Lisa! said:I'm a member of a forum and lots of ghosts post there. Some of them even talk to me and ask me questions :uhh: and whenever I look around I don't see any online member with that name but I see their posts! :uhh: :uhh:
mamasue said:Why wouldn't we believe that their "energy" could still be somehow trapped today in our sight?
I don't know american law. In my country such claim would never be accepted by a judge, even if we have as many gullible people here as in the US, may be more.mamasue said:Are you questioning the reason for the lawsuit? Or what? It is a fact in many cities, the buyer must be notified prior to a sale of a piece of property if it has a history of being haunted. What is your thoughts on this? I don't understand why the new buyer would not allow it to be exorcised by the church. Just because it is a different church than his? Makes no sense on his part.
“tigmatized property” . . . has been defined as “property psychologically impacted by an event which occurred or was suspected to have occurred on the property, such event being one that has no physical impact of any kind.” National Association of Realtors, Study Guide: Stigmatized Property 2 (1990), quoted in Robert M. Morgan, The Expansion of the Duty of Disclosure in Real Estate Transactions: It’s Not Just for Sellers Anymore, Fla. B.J., Feb. 1994, at 31.
The statutory solution in Florida is typical. Fla. Stat. § 689.25 provides:
(1) (a) The fact that an occupant of real property is infected or has been infected with human immunodeficiency virus or diagnosed with acquired immune deficiency syndrome is not a material fact that must be disclosed in a real estate transaction.
(b) The fact that a property was, or was at any time suspected to have been, the site of a homicide, suicide, or death is not a material fact that must be disclosed in a real estate transaction.
(2) A cause of action shall not arise against an owner of real property, his or her agent, an agent of a transferee of real property, or a person licensed under chapter 475 for the failure to disclose to the transferee that the property was or was suspected to have been the site of a homicide, suicide, or death or that an occupant of that property was infected with human immunodeficiency virus or diagnosed with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.