Another physical question

  • Thread starter gn0m0n
  • Start date
  • #1
33
1
Hi, I am wondering what justifies the substitution p_x -> (h/i)d/dx ? I know it is very common but I have not seen a reason for it anywhere. Why does it make physical sense?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
410
0
For a plane wave, that is [itex]\psi(x) = e^{i k x}[/itex], [itex]\frac{1}{i} d/dx[/itex] extracts the wave vector or wavenumber [itex]k[/itex]of the wave. From there we use de Broglie's relation to get the [tex]\hbar[/tex].
 
  • #3
5,428
292
There's rather a good mathematical reason. The quantum Lagrangian is invariant under spatial translations, which guarantees momentum conservation. As Dirac shows, d/dx is the generator of translations ( page 100 'Princples..'). Dirac calls translation 'displacement' and demonstrates that the action of the operator is to return the momentum.

Clever fellow, that Dirac.
 
  • #4
33
1
Thanks once again, all.
 

Related Threads on Another physical question

  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
807
Replies
13
Views
877
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
562
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top