I got so much excellent help from my last question that I have decided to take advantage as much as I can. Here is another question.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

On page 202, I combine equations 8.18 and 8.19 and change bars for primes (to match eqn. 8.22)

[tex]g_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha' \beta'} + \Lambda^{\mu}_{\alpha'}\Lambda^{\nu}_{\beta'}h_{\mu \nu}[/tex]

where [itex]\Lambda[/itex] is a boost. Here is eqn 8.21 with the non-linear terms deleted

[tex]\Lambda^{\alpha}_{\beta'} = \delta^{\alpha}_{\beta} - \xi^{\alpha}_{,\beta}[/tex]

Combining these I get:

[tex]g_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha' \beta'} + (\delta^{\mu}_{\alpha} - \xi^{\mu}_{,\alpha})(\delta^{\nu}_{\beta} - \xi^{\nu}_{,\beta})h_{\mu \nu}[/tex]

using [itex]\eta_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha \beta}[/itex], expanding the factors, and dropping the term quadratic in [itex]\xi[/itex] I get:

[tex]g_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha \beta} + \delta^{\mu}_{\alpha}\delta^{\nu}_{\beta}h_{\mu \nu} - \xi^{\mu}_{,\alpha}\delta^{\nu}_{\beta}h_{\mu \nu} - \delta^{\mu}_{\alpha}\xi^{\nu}_{,\beta}h_{\mu \nu}[/tex]

[tex]g_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha \beta} + h_{\alpha \beta} - \xi^{\mu}_{,\alpha}h_{\mu \beta} - \xi^{\nu}_{,\beta}h_{\alpha \nu}[/tex]

Now, finally, comes my question:

How can I use eqn 8.23 to simplify this to 8.22? It looks like Schutz is using h as if it were [itex]\eta[/itex]

Here is 8.23

[tex]\xi_{\alpha} = \eta_{\alpha \beta}\xi^{\beta}[/tex]

Here is 8.22

[tex]g_{\alpha' \beta'} = \eta_{\alpha \beta} + h_{\alpha \beta} - \xi_{\alpha,\beta} - \xi_{\beta,\alpha}[/tex]

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Another question from Schutz

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**