Hold James Randi Fans to the Same Standards

  • Thread starter Fredrik
  • Start date
In summary, Ivan has been repeatedly asking for proof of Randi's million dollars and has been met with resistance and avoidance. He believes that a public discussion should be finished in a public forum. Others have pointed out that the James Randi educational foundation has information on how to get in touch with them for proof. However, Ivan is skeptical of Randi's true intentions and questions whether he can be trusted. He also believes that the burden of proof lies with those defending Randi's challenge, not with him to prove their claims. Overall, there is controversy surrounding Randi's challenge and the existence of the million dollars.
  • #1
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,877
422
Ivan, it's going to be very hard to answer you if you keep closing every thread as soon as you have made a post in it. I thought about just sending you a private message, but I think that a discussion that was started in a public forum should be finished in a public forum.

Ivan Seeking said:
I asked for proof of Randi's million dollars and this creates a controversy?
No, you didn't just ask for proof. You asked, received an answer, and ignored it. That's not the same thing.

Ivan Seeking said:
I have looked for the proof and didn't find any.
Where did you look? Under a rock? I would look at the James Randi educational foundation. This page tells you how you can get in touch with them.

Ivan Seeking said:
If and when you have a link that shows undeniable proof of the money then please post it.
A link!? To a web page?! What exactly should be on that page? A picture of James Randi and a pile of cash? What exactly would you accept as "undeniable proof"?

If you write to the JREF, they will send you a copy of the latest monthly account statement from the brokerage house that holds the negotiable bonds. If that's not good enough for you, then what is?

Ivan Seeking said:
Until then, I am treating this as any other crackpot claim made without proof.
Wow. You're actually saying that it's a "crackpot claim" to say that James Randi isn't a fraud.

Ivan Seeking said:
I think our James Randi fans should be held to the same standards as they hold everyone else.
I agree. However, it's very dishonest of you to pretend that that's what you're doing here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I hope the old thread re-opens I've collected a lot of data id still like
to post up..
As for James Randi, the issue of the money is an important one, but what i personally feel is that there are so many more issues surrounding the man that i find very questionable.
Ive read his requirements for studies, and as i remember Randi can turn you away for what ever reason he chooses, and is not even obliged to give an explanation. Couple that with the fact that he's set himself up as the 'debunker of all things paranormal' who will loose not only his reputation but a large chunk of money if one of his experiments proves the existence of esp... and i really don't see any reason to treat him as a credible level-headed scientist.
Whats to stop him simply turning someone away if he thinks they might have a good chance of winning that money? absolutely nothing, and he has plenty of motivation to do just that.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I almost deleted this thread but instead I will state my position as clearly as I can.

First of all, I don't trust James Randi. This is a just an impression based on my own correspondence with him. So in spite of the apparently sacred waters on which I tread, I am being honest. Next, the burden of proof lies with the claimant. If you wish to defend Randi's challenge then the burden of proof lies with you to retrieve and post either a current copy of the account as an attachment, or a link that provides the same. It is not my job to prove the claims of others.

If or when you have such a link or attachment, please post it. Otherwise I will issue a formal warning if another thread like this is started. I have worked for thousands of hours to support my own position on various subjects. You can spend ten minutes defending yours; if that's really all it takes.

As for crackpot claims: I consider absolute claims made without proof [such as I can read your mind, or I know a guy who has a million dollars] as crackpot; no matter the subject.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I should add this; self employment and my entrepreneurial pursuits have left me a little...okay extremely cynical about anything that involves money. I would actually be pleased to know that Randi is really the altruist so many seem to believe him to be. Frankly, I don't believe it.

I am also amazed that not one "skeptic" that cited Randi's challenge here has ever bothered to check and see that the money really exists. This is why I refer to Randi's true believers. Most of his fans seem to believe everything he claims, without proof. Talk about irony!
 
Last edited:

1. What are the standards that James Randi fans are held to?

The standards that James Randi fans are held to include critical thinking, skepticism, and a commitment to evidence-based reasoning.

2. How do James Randi fans apply these standards in their daily lives?

James Randi fans apply these standards by questioning claims, seeking evidence to support beliefs, and avoiding logical fallacies and biases.

3. Are James Randi fans expected to be experts in science and skepticism?

No, James Randi fans are not expected to be experts in these fields, but they are encouraged to educate themselves and continue learning about critical thinking and skepticism.

4. Do James Randi fans believe in anything without proof?

No, James Randi fans prioritize evidence and proof over belief. They may have beliefs, but they are willing to change them if presented with compelling evidence.

5. Is it fair to hold James Randi fans to higher standards than other people?

Yes, it is fair to hold James Randi fans to higher standards because they actively promote critical thinking and skepticism. It is important for them to practice what they preach and hold themselves accountable for their beliefs and actions.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
23
Views
869
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
893
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
59
Views
9K
Replies
35
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
647
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top