- #1
sameandnot
- 301
- 0
is there some substantial, philosophical problem with exploring unorthodox questions, through unorthodox approaches, within the philosophical community?
do we need a "philosophy mom" to restrict us to the "proper way" of examining ideas?
why the censoring of intellectual exploration? do we all learn the same way? is the "proper way" the right way, and the only right way?
can we say that anyone is perfectly knowledgeable, so as to assume control over the creative exploration of ideas? i think not.
anyone notice the "boxing of creativity" and "free play" that is occurring in "philosophy" forums? does anyone care? does anyone approve?
why do you answer the way you do?
do we need a "philosophy mom" to restrict us to the "proper way" of examining ideas?
why the censoring of intellectual exploration? do we all learn the same way? is the "proper way" the right way, and the only right way?
can we say that anyone is perfectly knowledgeable, so as to assume control over the creative exploration of ideas? i think not.
anyone notice the "boxing of creativity" and "free play" that is occurring in "philosophy" forums? does anyone care? does anyone approve?
why do you answer the way you do?