Is Selective Breeding the Key to Making Apes More Human-Like?

  • Thread starter JerryClower
  • Start date
In summary, the idea of selectively breeding apes and other primates to become more human-like is not a feasible or high-priority objective for scientists due to the time-consuming nature of the process and the lack of interest in proving or disproving evolution of humans. Additionally, even if evolution were proved through such experiments, it is unlikely to convince those who do not believe in it. A similar breeding experiment was conducted in the Soviet Union with foxes, showing that changes can occur over generations but it still resulted in animals that were still foxes, not dogs. These domesticated foxes are now available for sale in the United States, but they have a short lifespan and are illegal to own in many states. Overall, the proposed breeding
  • #1
JerryClower
68
1
Why don't scientists try to breed apes and other primates selectively to try to get them to become more human-like? We could do it over generations and generations and keep track of the differences with cameras. Sounds like a great idea in trying to prove or disprove evolution of humans.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
That would be an extremely time-consuming affair, since great apes (like humans) are rarely able to reproduce before the age of 8 to 10. And, among people with enough resources to pull this off, proving or disproving evolution of humans is normally not a high-priority objective.
 
  • #3
hamster143 said:
That would be an extremely time-consuming affair, since great apes (like humans) are rarely able to reproduce before the age of 8 to 10. And, among people with enough resources to pull this off, proving or disproving evolution of humans is normally not a high-priority objective.
But if evolution is proved then scientists would be able to shut up creationists and religious people. I mean, if we share 95% of our DNA, we should be able to breed them to our liking, thus, over a lot of time, making them more human like. It doesn't have to "change" into a human species. It just needs to show some small characteristics (more than it already does lol) so that many people who don't believe in the theory of evolution can see what happens.
 
  • #4
A lot of scientists speculate that humans got their bipedal walking from having to walk through swamps and tall weeds. We could put apes in environments similar to what I described and then see what happens.
 
  • #5
JerryClower said:
But if evolution is proved then scientists would be able to shut up creationists and religious people.
It wouldn't prove it - nutters (sorry deeply committed religous people) would claim that it proved you needed a god to direct evolution.

Evolution has already been proved in every hospital with MRSA and every druggie with drug resistant TB.

There was a breeding program like your described in the soviet union with dogs, IIRC they showed you could go from wolves to dogs in a few decades.
 
  • #6
mgb_phys said:
It wouldn't prove it - nutters (sorry deeply committed religous people) would claim that it proved you needed a god to direct evolution.

Evolution has already been proved in every hospital with MRSA and every druggie with drug resistant TB.

There was a breeding program like your described in the soviet union with dogs, IIRC they showed you could go from wolves to dogs in a few decades.


I had always read of that breeding experiment in the Soviet Union being with Foxes not wolves and they were still foxes afterwards not dogs at all (although similar to dogs.)
http://www.overpill.com/2009/12/21/soviet-scientist-turns-foxes-into-puppies/

What is extremely remarkable about that experiment is that the 'human friendly' foxes, after so many generations, had floppy ears and a broken patterned coat and curly tails(like cows or dogs) among other features.
It is a very significant experiment to me because of my own nutter ideas which I won't mention here.
 
  • #7
BTW, these domesticated foxes are now available for sale in the United States. $6000 including shipping from Siberia. Unfortunately, foxes don't live that long (shorter than cats), they can't be bred because they are neutered before the sale, and they are illegal to own in at least 20 states.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Like I said, if it takes even 10 generations to produce visible changes (and 10 generations is not a lot), that's 100-120 years if you work with gorillas or orangutans, 150 years if you work with chimps. Like mgb_phys said, even that is not going to convince anyone who hasn't been convinced yet. You could try to cut down those numbers through IVF & such, but that's going to shoot down your credibility among the creationist crowd even lower than it was to begin with (if that is at all possible).
 
Last edited:
  • #9
ThomasEdison said:
Foxes not wolves...
What is extremely remarkable about that experiment is that the 'human friendly' foxes, after so many generations, had floppy ears and a broken patterned coat and curly tails(like cows or dogs) among other features.

Thanks, that's what I was remembering
 

1. How does selective breeding work in apes?

Selective breeding in apes involves choosing certain individuals with desired traits, such as intelligence or physical strength, and breeding them together to produce offspring with those traits. This process is repeated over multiple generations to achieve the desired characteristics in the population.

2. What are the benefits of selective breeding in apes?

The main benefit of selective breeding in apes is the ability to produce individuals with specific traits that are desired by humans, such as increased intelligence or strength. This can also help improve the overall health and survival of the population by reducing the likelihood of genetic diseases and increasing genetic diversity.

3. Are there any ethical concerns with selective breeding in apes?

Yes, there are ethical concerns with selective breeding in apes. This practice raises questions about the rights and well-being of the animals being bred and the potential for exploitation. It is important to consider the ethical implications and ensure that the welfare of the animals is a top priority.

4. How does selective breeding impact the natural behavior of apes?

Selective breeding can potentially impact the natural behavior of apes by favoring certain traits over others. This can lead to changes in their behavior and social structures, as well as potential health issues. It is important to carefully consider the effects of selective breeding on the natural behavior of apes.

5. Can selective breeding be used to "create" new species of apes?

No, selective breeding cannot create new species of apes. It can only manipulate the existing genetic variation within a species. To create a new species, significant genetic changes and isolation from other populations are needed, which cannot be achieved through selective breeding alone.

Similar threads

  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
4
Views
834
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
14K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top