1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Programs Applying for Physics PhD

  1. May 16, 2012 #1
    Hey

    I am a Physics student in UK. I will be finishing my second year at the end of this month. Then, I would have 2 graduation options

    1. I can graduate in 2013 with a BSc in Physics OR
    2. I can graduate in 2014 with a MSc in Physics

    I want to apply to US universities for my PhD. So, I wanted to know whether I should apply for the Fall 2013 session? Do universities normally accept students who are in their final year of undergraduate studies?

    Or would I have a better chance of getting in for the Fall 2014 session after obtaining my Masters?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 16, 2012 #2
    It would be useful for someone to write up a FAQ on the different systems of graduate education.

    Anyhow, US physics graduate programs are usually joint Masters-Ph.D. programs, and in the US system the application is made at the end of undergraduate.

    I don't think that the Masters would make a difference for most US graduate schools. You'd still be considered in incoming student and you'd have to take the intro graduate classes and pass the qualifying exams.

    On the other hand, getting a Masters degree would be useful as an emergency parachute.
     
  4. May 16, 2012 #3

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    I thought I did already in my essay? Part VII.

    Zz.
     
  5. May 16, 2012 #4
    ok, so just to clarify - I can apply to a PhD program while I am still in my final year in college?
     
  6. May 16, 2012 #5
    Hi Donaldx

    Disclaimer: I'm familiar with the U.S. math system; I assume physics is the same.

    Most people in the U.S. apply for graduate programs right after their Bachelors. I don't know how things are in the UK, but I believe in a lot of European schools, you enter a Ph.D program and immediately start research (hence most enter with a Masters degree). Not in the U.S. The majority of students spend 4-6 years in their program, with the first two years spent primarily on course work/studying for quals. After passing your quals you automatically qualify for a masters degree at most schools. What I'm trying to get at is that a Masters in the U.S. means something different than a Masters elsewhere.

    However, if you enter in with a Masters degree, you still spend time preparing for quals. You can take them early, but a Masters degree does not automatically jump you ahead in the system.

    The last point I want to make, and really the only thing that hasn't been raised by the previous posters is that I believe a Masters degree improves your chances for acceptance at most schools, provided they are not one of the extremely elite schools.
     
  7. May 16, 2012 #6

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    More precisely: They apply to graduate programs during their last year of Bachelors studies, generally during the November-January time period. If accepted, they begin their graduate studies in the fall semester after they finish their Bachelors.
     
  8. May 17, 2012 #7
    Hi,

    Just to put my two cents in:

    I am a UK undergrad, who applied to both UK and US PhD programs (eventually deciding for a UK Uni) and was successful in both applications so I think I know what they are looking for, and there is a bit of a difference.

    When you say MSc, are you planning on doing an undergrad masters, MSci, or the post-graduate taught masters, MSc? I did the undergrad MSci and applied for PhDs during my final year - around Nov/Dec for USA and Jan/Feb for UK. I would say that if you are set on doing the US PhD route then the masters may be a waste of time in the sense that you will still have to sit the upper level physics courses in grad school, and won't be able to avoid them even if you have already taken the same material (well, I wasn't allowed to at any rate, and even if you were, the comps/quals will be based on the material taught). So, by doing a masters in the UK you are effectively adding on an extra year to your education (which will be a 4/5/6 year commitment in the US). I decided to do the MSci anyway, already knowing that I planned to apply to the US, as the MSci is a better qualification to apply to UK Unis with and I wasn't sure where I wanted to go in the end (not sure about the MSc, but I imagine its similar). That said, I think the MSci did help me with my US apps anyway, since they saw that I was already taking grad level classes, and would have a good grounding for doing their versions of the course.

    The other thing you have to consider is timing - if you plan to apply for the 2013 semester for the US, then start looking into studying for the Physics GRE and sitting it by Oct 2013 at the latest, or April 2013 if you are ready. I was daft and didn't think it would be a popular exam in the UK so when I went to book it it was fully booked for the Oct and Nov 2011 dates (there are only dates in April, Oct, and Nov). So I wasn't able to sit the physics GRE (I did the general GRE after I had applied and then sent the results on to the Unis). Now this is a major disadvantage and pretty much ruled out every US uni as a LOT of credence is given to the physics GRE. Luckily, I had contacts at the two Unis that I was most interested in working at and they kindly waived the need for the PGRE or told me to sit it after I got there. I don't know what the PGRE is like so maybe a US student can fill you in on that.

    I think that the US schools pay close attention to the GRE and letters of reference, with research experience and grades after that... at least that was the impression I got. The UK unis I applied for were more keen on speaking about past research experience I had and why I was specifically interested in that field (as well as grades, obv). If i'm honest, the UK application process seemed 'friendlier' for want of a better word and I found the US process more involved but I think this is because they get *so* many applicants that it becomes almost an industrial scale process. That shouldn't put you off at all(!), I really encourage you to apply to the US - just be prepared to spend a good amount of time crafting a good personal statement for the US schools to set you apart, and finding good referees.

    Last thing (as this is becoming an essay!) is that in both countries, you should get in touch with Profs/researchers - just an email with CV attached explaining why you are interested in their research and maybe asking some questions about what they see future students working on. A personal touch like this shows you have a specific interest and will hopefully make your name stick out on a stack of applicants.

    So, the overriding message from my ramblings is study for and do the Physics GRE if you are going to apply to US Schools.

    If you have any specific questions about the application process from a UK student perspective then feel free to PM me :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Applying for Physics PhD
Loading...