Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am trying to examine the following differential equation:

diff(M(a), a) =

Lambda * ( 1 -

epsilon * int(M(b)*exp(-sigma*(a-b)), b = 0 .. a) ) -

mu * M(a)

I found out that this kind of equation can be solved for M(a) by applying Laplace-Transformation, solving for Laplace(M(a)) and then applying inverse Laplace-Transformation. This works quite fine e.g. in Maple.

Now, I would like to extend above equation by sort of adding a second convolution term, so that

diff(M(a), a) =

Lambda * ( 1 -

epsilon * int(M(b)*exp(-sigma*(a-b)), b = 0 .. a) ) +

gamma * int(M(b)*exp(-tau*(a-b)), b = 0 .. a) ) -

mu * M(a)

But apparently this is not solvable in the same way. At least, Maple won't find the inverse Laplace that I need for the final solution.

I would appreciate very much any hints regarding whether a differential equation like this should be solvable by this method, or if there are other methods I could try, or if it simply cannot be solved?

Many thanks and best wishes-

Lutz

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Approach to 'double convolution'?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Approach 'double convolution' | Date |
---|---|

B Simple double integration of square wave question | Aug 16, 2017 |

Helmholtz equation and Multislice approach | Sep 29, 2014 |

NUMERICAL approach to NONLINEAR PDE | Jan 13, 2014 |

Is ln(N-K) equal to ln(1-N/K);different approach different result,why? | Jul 14, 2013 |

Solving DE- which approach and more importantly - why | Apr 18, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**