Are electrons or protons attracted due to their magnetic moments?

[Javier Lopez]

Does electrons or other particles attracted towards a magnet due its magnetic momentum?

 

[mfb]

There is a force towards regions of stronger magnetic fields. Which can be towards a magnet but doesn't have to be. The Stern-Gerlach experiment is one example.

For free charged particles typically electric fields acting on the electric charge are more important.

 

[Javier Lopez]

I suppose that the Lorentz force is greater also than the magnetic moment force

At large distances I have seen that the force is:
$$
Fm=\mu \frac{q_{m1}*q_{m2}}{4*\pi *r^2}\\\\
Fe=\frac{1}{4*\pi*\epsilon_0 }*\frac{Q_1*Q_2}{r^2}
$$

As long as magnetic moment of deuterium es 8e-24 and charge is 1.6e-18 the electrostatic force is 3.6e25 times higher.
At short distances things changes drastically as long as magnetic moment force rises with 1/r^4 and accordingly my calculus cancells electrostatics field force for deuterium-deuterium at 2e-13 m that I supposse falls within QM equations.
What is approximately the validity range of classical approach?. In my simulator I use classical approach to calculate magnetic fields and EM forces due coils

 

[mfb]

What is approximately the validity range of classical approach?

Compare the usual parameter sets (position&momentum, energy&time, spin) with the Planck constant. If they are large a classical approach might work.

I don't see how you got 2e-13m but it looks way too large.

 

[Javier Lopez]

I have made a more approximate calculus and obtained 4.97e-13 that is more large.
I obtained that data using the classical aproach:
$$
F_e=K*\frac{Q*Q'}{2^2}\\\\
F_m=\frac{3*10^{-7}*m1*m2}{r^4}*(-3*cos(\theta )*cos(\varphi)+sin(\theta)*sin(\varphi)*cos(\phi ))\\\\
F_m max(\varphi,\theta,\phi=0)=\frac{3*10^{-7}*m1*m2}{r^4}*(-3)
$$
Where the electrostatic force at 4.97e-13 was 9.34e-4 Newtons
And magnetic force almost similar. I used for deuterium magnetic moment 7.95e-24 J/T (and all angles=0 to have maximum magnetic force)

 

[mfb]

I used for deuterium magnetic moment 7.95e-24 J/T (and all angles=0 to have maximum magnetic force)

I don't know where you got that value from but it is three orders of magnitude too large.

 

[Javier Lopez]

You must be true, I multiplied the deuterium magnetic moment 2.79284734 by Born magneton (9.274009994E-24 J/T) instead of nuclear magneton: 5.050783699e-27 J/T
Thank you very much, now I can correct my equations

Now the equilibrium point is 2.7e-16 m where both forces are 3.17 kiloNewtons
2.7 e-16 is a lot lower than the square root of the cross section of the deuterium-deuterium reaction

 

[mfb]

2.7e-16 m is also smaller than the size of the deuterium nucleus. They cannot come that close and the formulas you used break down before that, in addition the strong interaction is dominant at very small distances.

 

[Javier Lopez]

I agree at all. At larger distances it gives me an idea of how an external magnetic field could help to increase the cross section, but I should be sure having the correct coefficients

About the Planck constant I suppose that I have to use the h=1.986-25 J/m, so for 650KeV protons we should have:

$$\frac{h}{E}=\frac{1.98644*10^{-25}J*m}{650000 eV * 1.6021*10^{-19} J/eV}=1.9*10^{-12}m$$

That is close to the famous 2 picometers where strong forces have a minimum

 

[mfb]

The strong force is completely irrelevant at 2 picometers. And I don't think the distance you calculated has a meaning.

 

[Vanadium 50]

That is close to the famous 2 picometers where strong forces have a minimum

Not very famous - I never heard of such a thing. At 2000 fm the strong force is effectively zero.

The other numbers seem to be from random equations.

 

[snorkack]

A magnetic pole actually repels a free charge like an electron or a proton, unless it moves precisely along a field line or is stationary.
Magnetic momenta, such as that of a neutron, which has no charge, are attracted to magnetic poles.

 

[Javier Lopez]

A magnetic pole actually repels a free charge like an electron or a proton...

Why?, magnetic moment of loops makes them attract between them in 180º degree range and repels if in the 180º opposite directions like magnets does.

 

[mfb]

Now consider where 2000 fm would be on that scale.

 

[Javier Lopez]

You are right, I deleted the wrong part

 

[snorkack]

Why?, magnetic moment of loops makes them attract between them in 180º degree range and repels if in the 180º opposite directions like magnets does.

Consider a charge regardless of sign moving through uniform magnetic field with parallel field lines in direction other than directly along the magnetic field.
If the movement of the charge is at right angle to magnetic field then Lorentz force is at right angle to direction of movement and magnetic field - to the centre of a circle, balanced by a centrifugal force. If the movement of the charge is at an acute angle to magnetic field then the Lorentz force is still at right angle, but now to axis of a helix.

But now consider the charge moving in nonuniform magnetic field, where the field lines converge at a pole.
The Lorentz force is still at right angle to magnetic field and direction of movement. But considering the simple case of field and motion direction at right angle: since the field lines along the circle are not parallel, the Lorentz forces along the circle no longer cancel out with each other and centrifugal force. They leave a resultant force away from the pole.
If the charge is different or the identity of magnetic pole is different, only the direction of circling will change. The resultant repulsive force on a moving charge is the same: always from stronger magnetic field to weaker.

 

[shjacks45]

No. An ion at rest has no magnetic moment. The ion would have spin angular momentum which affect particle internal energy levels only. Magnetic fields only interact with charges in motion.

 

[mfb]

Magnetic fields only interact with charges in motion.

... and spin, which this thread is about.

The ion would have spin angular momentum which affect particle internal energy levels only.

That is not true. See e.g. the Stern-Gerlach experiment.

 

[Vanadium 50]

An ion at rest has no magnetic moment.

That is not true. In fact, the H+ ion's magnetic moment has been measured to something like nine or ten decimal places.

 

[shjacks45]

... and spin, which this thread is about.That is not true. See e.g. the Stern-Gerlach experiment.

I assume you think Stern-Gerlach experiment use stationary particles?

 

[mfb]

The motion is irrelevant for the force acting on the particles. It's just there for the convenience of the experimental setup.

If you are here to reinforce misconceptions you have then this won't work well.

 

[vanhees71]

No. An ion at rest has no magnetic moment. The ion would have spin angular momentum which affect particle internal energy levels only. Magnetic fields only interact with charges in motion.

No, an ion at rest with a magnetic moment interacts with a magnetic field as a bar magnet at rest interacts with a magnetic field. If the magnetic field is homogeneous, there's only a torque to the effect of orienting the magnetic moment in direction of the field. If the magnetic field is inhomogeneous there's also a force. For magnetostatics it's $\vec{F}=\vec{\nabla}(\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{B})$.

The SGE works in fact because of both effects: On the one hand you have an inhomogeneous magnetic field leading to a force on the (electrically neutral!) particle leading to the entanglement between position and spin-$z$ component (when making the magnetic field's homogeneous part, which should be large to point in $z$-direction) and at the same time you have this large homogeneous part of the field such that the magnetic moment of the particle rapidly precesses around the $z$ direction such that effectively only the $z$ component of the magnetic field is relevant for the particle's motion.