Are fields ignored in conservation of 4-momentum problems?

  • #1
469
174
When we encounter particle-collision problems that call for invoking the conservation of four-momentum, are we tacitly assuming a field-free idealization (or at least negligible potential energy)?

For example, say particles 1 and 2 collide elastically. Then the conservation of four-momentum says:
$$\mathbf{P}_{1,i} + \mathbf{P}_{2,i} = \mathbf{P}_{1,f}+ \mathbf{P}_{2,f}$$ (where ##i## means initial and ##f## means final).

But in reality, there's potential energy associated with the (changing) relative positions of the particles, isn't there? So to express the full picture, would we add ##\mathbf{P}_{\textrm{field},i}## to the left side and ##\mathbf{P}_{\textrm{field},f}## to the right side?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
robphy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
6,284
1,609
We do something similar in nonrelativistic physics.
 
  • #3
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,381
464
But in reality, there's potential energy associated with the (changing) relative positions of the particles, isn't there?
Well, you'd better ask yourself what would happen if you consider the momentum of the particles 1,2,3,4 pretty "far-away" , that is final corresponding to [itex]t \rightarrow \infty[/itex] and initial to [itex] t \rightarrow - \infty[/itex] (or you can see infinity as 'very large').
As long as no new particles as asymptotic states are produced by the interaction of 1,2 to 3,4 the momenta of initial and final should be equal by conservation of energy/momentum.... no matter what happened inbetween, since anything that happens inbetween is going to conserve the momentum..
 
  • #4
Khashishi
Science Advisor
2,815
493
You do need to include the energy+momentum of the fields. A bound positron and electron (positronium) has less energy than a free positron and electron. That extra energy has to come from somewhere!
 
  • #5
ChrisVer
Gold Member
3,381
464
You do need to include the energy+momentum of the fields. A bound positron and electron (positronium) has less energy than a free positron and electron. That extra energy has to come from somewhere!
the bound state of electron and positron [positronium] is again giving you some photons... and the result is again to take: Let's say you have this process:
[itex]e^- e^+ \rightarrow P(^1S_0) \rightarrow \gamma \gamma[/itex]
again you can use [itex]p_{e-} + p_{e+} = p_{\gamma} + p_{\gamma}[/itex]... as if you forget what happened at the intermediate step.
 

Related Threads on Are fields ignored in conservation of 4-momentum problems?

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
869
  • Last Post
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
67
Views
2K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
89
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
790
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
Top