1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Are the Feynman Lectures on Physics books good?

  1. May 9, 2005 #1
    Are the "Feynman Lectures on Physics" books good?

    Are the "Feynman Lectures on Physics" books good?

    I'm going into my junior year next year and wonder if these books are any good to study over the summer?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 9, 2005 #2

    chroot

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    They are beautiful books, which will teach you a considerable amount of the long-view of physics. They will inspire you and have you feeling as though you really understand for the first time in your life.

    They will not, under any circumstances, teach you to solve any physics problems, or get any better grades.

    If you're honing your physical intuition, the books are one-of-a-kind. If you're looking to ace your next exam, you'd be much better off with a good textbook.

    - Warren
     
  4. May 10, 2005 #3

    James R

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    A word of warning, though:

    The way Feynman approaches some topics is quite unusual, and may not be the way you would usually see topics presented in a standard textbook. For that reason, it might be better to read Feynman as well as a more standard text, rather than relying just on Feynman.
     
  5. May 10, 2005 #4
    If you're an undergrad with limited time - don't bother with Feynman. As chroot says - get a good textbook or two.
     
  6. May 10, 2005 #5

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Either way,you HAVE TO read Feynman.

    Daniel.
     
  7. May 10, 2005 #6

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    It is important to note that Matthew Sands has this to say regarding the book he helped to co-author:

    M. Sands, Physics Today v.58, p.49 (2005).

    Zz.
     
  8. May 10, 2005 #7

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    anybody who doubts the value of the one set of lectures in existence by this great physicist is in need of a serious dope slap.


    do you want to be a physicist? was feynman trying to tell you how to think like one?


    If his insights are not helpful in your cousre maybe your course is lacking something.

    don't be a noodge, read feynman and decide for yourself.
     
  9. May 10, 2005 #8
    There's a well-known quote by the physicist (and great textbook author) JJ Sakurai in his textbook Advanced Quantum Mechanics: "The reader who has read the book but cannot do the exercises has learned nothing".

    I'm willing to bet that the average person who reads Feynman (and no other book) and feels that he has gained great insights into mysteries of physics, will not be able to solve a single problem in a typical undergraduate textbook. Certainly not a single problem in Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, and probably not any of the problems in Goldstein's Mechanics.

    There's a reason why no undergraduate class (not even at Caltech) uses Feynman as a primary textbook for QM, mechanics, or E&M. Not because the book is technically difficult, but because it's not very useful for learning technique. And as evidenced by the large number of cranks who come in here with new, bogus physics theories after they read Hawking or Kaku or whatever pop-phys book is out there, mastery of technique MUST come first, otherwise you end up spouting nonsense. At least for 99.999% of the physics undergrads out there who are not born geniuses like Feynman.

    Feynman is great. But learn the physics first from a course textbook. Then read Feyman.
     
  10. May 10, 2005 #9

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Incidentally,i was urged to read Feynman lectures before graduating high-school.My HS teacher always mentioned & praised this book and an old friend of his who had translated it into Romanian.I think it didn't hurt,cause i really stayed away from the advanced part in the 2-nd & 3-rd volumes.

    Daniel.
     
  11. May 10, 2005 #10

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    actually there is no contradiction among the last three posts. feynmans lectures are extremely valuable, and juvenal is maintaining that they are however insufficient for most people, who aspire to technical competency.
     
  12. May 10, 2005 #11

    James R

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I read the Feynman lectures while I was doing my Honours year in Physics. It was great to get a different perspective on all the things I was supposed to already know, and I got a lot out of it. But, as others have said, the Feynman lectures are no substitute for a course textbook. In themselves, they don't cover all bases, and don't include the wealth of examples and exercises that every good undergraduate text does these days.

    It is also probably worth mentioning that, for obvious reasons, the Feynman lectures aren't up-to-date with recent developments in physics.
     
  13. May 10, 2005 #12

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    They weren't meant to be actual.They were held in 1962,and the 'furtherst' he got was quantum mechanics.Quantum Mechanics won't change in the next 1000 yrs or so,unless some catastrophy wipes out humanity and then we'll have to take it all over again with stone age--->M theory.:biggrin:

    Daniel.
     
  14. May 10, 2005 #13

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    by the way, back in the late 60's to early 70's when i was looking for a textbook that gave more than a passing intuition of the subject, something you could actually nail down more than feynmans lectures, i remember the berkeley series in physics looked more accessible to me.

    are those still around?
     
  15. May 10, 2005 #14
    For the record, they are not the only lectures in existence. I have a set of videotapes of Feynman lecturing to a non-technical audience on QED no less! It's called QED in New Zealand. It's a set of 4 ~1 hour lectures plus a few questions after each.

    Even with my limited scientific background, I was certainly able to understand what he said (with some significant rewinding :wink:) and see how it clearly explained certain common effects like mirror reflection, lenses, colors in a soap bubble, etc. However, as others have said, I couldn't solve a QED problem. Still it's a lot of fun to watch him lecture and even more fun to actually get what he's saying. The content of the lectures is essentially the same as in his book QED.

    You can buy these lectures and other Feynman stuff at The Tuva Trader or watch them on streaming video at Feynman Online.

    I haven't read the FLOP (eek! that's the abbreviation?!? :grumpy:) but I want to get them soon.
     
  16. May 10, 2005 #15

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Well,they still are.Of course,i have a problem with a physics book being too "accessible",but these ones are worth reading,too.Just like Schaum's outlines.

    Daniel.
     
  17. May 11, 2005 #16
  18. May 11, 2005 #17
    I also read the book QED (Quantum ElectroDynamics). The book is intended for the general public, so you can't blame it for being useless as a physics textbook. But it does provide a 'big picture' view that may be missing from a traditional physics education. I can't provide the exact quote, but in QED Feynman says something along the lines of "there is information in this book that students of QED are never told".

    As for the lectures, I only read the section on the double slit experiment. It was long after I had read Dirac's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics". Dirac's book gets much deeper into the mathematics, but like the lectures, is not sufficient as a textbook. I would call it a tie as to which of these two books gave me a better 'big picture' view of the material.
     
  19. May 11, 2005 #18

    mathwonk

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    2015 Award

    life is not only about solving problems in courses in school. understanding new things, and even being amazed by genius is wonderful too.

    once at harvard i had a question about a sophisticated calculation on theta functions, and asked barry mazur, (the guy who proof - read wiles' work on fermat).

    mazur kindly listened to me for over 1/2 hour, and then singled out one sentence in my presentation, and simply said, "now go ask your question of kazhdan, and don't tell him everything you told me, just ask this one sentence".

    so i went down and asked kazhdan why such and such should be true, and he said:

    [and i quote]: "what else could it BE?!"

    so i asked for more detail, and he began to explain briefly, that it followed from the symmetry of the situation, and then knowing what all lie groups of a certain type were.

    when i asked for yet more specific detail he tried, but was unable to give it or to make any calculation at all.

    i quickly realized that either petty calculation was not his forte, or i was wasting his time, and should figure that part out on my own, and left, thanking him profusely.

    any textbook can pose routine problems for you to solve. only feynman can give you his insight and perspective on the material. i suggest a wise person will cherish that opportunity.

    and feynman was both used as a text at harvard when i was a student there, and recommended by physics students and engineers to me as a self study source. i have enjoyed it ever since, although i am definitely a rookie in this subject.

    e.g. i have attended summer research and instructional sessions in quantum field theory and been annoyed that the speakers presented almost purely mathematics. The math was easy for me, but i wanted to know what it has to do with the physics, and feynman explained this to my satisfaction even in his little undergraduate lectures better than the specialists at the meeting for my money.

    i.e. those lecturers essentially said lets assume the physics is mirrored well by a manifold with a certain kind of metric or connection, and certain bundles, and now lets do some differential geometry.

    well i understand differential geometry better than i understand physics, so i don't care to hear that: i want to know why the physics should be represented that way.

    maybe some physicists discount feynman's lectures because he is explaining a way of thinking that they already have as second nature, but for me it is very helpful.

    also as a researcher in mathematics, i have found it useful not just to know how to do certain technical things, but why and when to do them. the analogous sort of insight seems found in feynman perhaps more than other places.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2005
  20. May 12, 2005 #19

    Phobos

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I listened to the lectures-on-tape...which I do not recommend since most of the time he was writing on/pointing to equations on the chalk board.
     
  21. May 22, 2005 #20
    I have listened to some of the lectures on tape, and I think it was quiet helpful. He does sometimes talk about equations on the board and the only way to follow it is if one had just studied the material and has an image of the equations in their mind. Then things become a lot clearer. Even with the mathematics aspect, Feynman does a good job in teaching the physics of things. And in a weird way, he can say something you've heard before but in a somewhat different subtle way and it makes more sense. Those are my two cents. Disclaimer: I am not a physics major, (I'm bioengineering) so I don't have the expertise to critque Feynman's lectures in a more technical manner.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Are the Feynman Lectures on Physics books good?
Loading...