Are there any book lover here?

  • Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Book
In summary, the passage is a quote that has been edited and so needs words added to make sense. There are lots of reasons for adding bits like this - usually to shortened the quote, comment, clarify, or shift blame. The Carlyle quote is so heavily edited we'd call it a "franken-quote" almost - a monster edited together from many parts. Missing parts of the quote are indicated by ellipses "..." (three dots).
  • #1
athrun200
277
0
When I read history books, I found there are some words written inside square brackets. What does that mean?

See my attachment
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 367
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    29.2 KB · Views: 402
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That normally suggests that the passage is a quote that has been edited and so needs words added to make sense.
 
  • #3
This would be correct - sections enclosed by square brackets inside a quotation are not part of the original text being quoted. There are lots of reasons for adding bits like this - usually to shorted the quote, comment, clarify, or shift blame.

n the second example, Carlyle is being quoted ... the start of the quote is "[A]ll" ... this tells you that the passage quoted is from the middle of a sentence - the actual word written was "all" but the rules of English mean it now needs a capital. Since that is not what Carlyle wrote, the cap has to be in square brackets.

Missing parts of the quote are indicated by elipses "..." (three dots). The Carlyle quote is so heavily edited we'd call it a "franken-quote" almost - a monster edited together from many parts.

This leaves "[sic]" which means "that is really how it appears in the original" - otherwise a grammar or spelling mistake in the original, and faithfully quoted, may be blamed on the author.

eg. Ryan_m_b wrote (above):
"[T]he passage is a quote that [sic] has been edited ... to make sense [of it]."
 
  • #4
For reference, here is the original. Don't worry, it's in the public domain. If you compare the quotation to the original, you will see the meaning of the brackets and the ellipses. As Simon Bridge pointed out, [sic] refers to the fact that the word 'were', just before it, is incorrect but reported verbatim (in other words, blame Carlyle, not me). Sic is the latin word for 'so'.

Carlyle said:
They were the leaders of men, these great ones; the modellers, patterns,
and in a wide sense creators, of whatsoever the general mass of
men contrived to do or to attain; all things that we see standing
accomplished in the world are properly the outer material result, the
practical realization and embodiment, of Thoughts that dwelt in the
Great Men sent into the world: the soul of the whole world's history, it
may justly be considered, were the history of these. Too clearly it is a
topic we shall do no justice to in this place!

One comfort is, that Great Men, taken up in any way, are profitable
company. We cannot look, however imperfectly, upon a great man, without
gaining something by him. He is the living light-fountain, which it
is good and pleasant to be near. The light which enlightens, which has
enlightened the darkness of the world; and this not as a kindled lamp
only, but rather as a natural luminary shining by the gift of Heaven; a
flowing light-fountain, as I say, of native original insight, of manhood
and heroic nobleness;--in whose radiance all souls feel that it is well
with them.

http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/0/9/1091/1091.txt"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Thx for these useful information!
 

1. Are there any book lover here?

Yes, there are definitely book lovers here! Many scientists are also passionate readers and enjoy incorporating literature into their research and studies.

2. What kind of books do scientists like to read?

It really depends on the individual scientist's interests and field of study. Some may enjoy reading popular science books, while others may prefer academic journals or non-fiction books related to their specific area of research.

3. Do scientists have time to read for pleasure?

Like anyone, scientists have different levels of free time and priorities. However, many scientists make time to read for pleasure as a way to relax and unwind from their work. It's also a great way to learn and expand their knowledge outside of their field.

4. How do books influence scientific thinking?

Books can have a significant impact on scientific thinking. They can introduce new concepts and ideas, challenge current beliefs, and inspire new research directions. Books also allow scientists to see topics from different perspectives, which can lead to new insights and breakthroughs.

5. Can reading fiction make someone a better scientist?

There is no definitive answer to this question, as everyone's experience and learning styles are different. However, reading fiction can help scientists develop empathy and creativity, which are essential skills in the research process. Additionally, fiction can also provide new perspectives and spark new ideas, making it a valuable tool for scientific thinking.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
376
Replies
3
Views
336
Replies
2
Views
917
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
898
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
21
Views
762
Replies
4
Views
741
Replies
8
Views
875
Back
Top