Are there really people like this?

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,543
564
Ok. I don't normally start new threads but I couldn't resist sharing this with you. On the opinion page of my local newspaper a reader wrote in the following:


Darwin theories

I am appalled that so-called "scientists' continue to teach dangerous theories to our impressionable children as though these were unchallenged facts. Newton's theory of gravity, not law, says that things should fall down. But clearly, the presence of birds, insects, clouds, etc., show the falseness of this theory.

Clearly things rise or fall based solely upon divine will. We do not float away because God chooses that we should not.

I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.




I can't really put into words what my opinion of this complete moron is. The writer talks about unchallenged facts and then comes with stupid non-sense about things rising and falling based upon divine will which is obviously lacking in credibility. I just can't put it into words...
 
Last edited:

Evo

Mentor
22,872
2,349
Averagesupernova said:
Ok. I don't normally start new threads but I couldn't resist sharing this with you. On the opinion page of my local newspaper a reader wrote in the following:


Darwin theories

I am appalled that so-called "scientists' continue to teach dangerous theories to our impressionable children as though these were unchallenged facts. Newton's theory of gravity, not law, says that things should fall down. But clearly, the presence of birds, insects, clouds, etc., show the falseness of this theory.

Clearly things rise or fall based solely upon divine will. We do not float away because God chooses that we should not.

I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.


I can't really put into words what my opinion of this complete moron is. The writer talks about unchallenged facts and then comes with stupid non-sense about things rising and falling based upon divine will which is obviously lacking in credibility. I just can't put it into words...
I'd hope it was just someone making fun of all of the religious fanatics but it's scary to think that this might be for real and not a joke.
 
54
0
Wow. Do you live in the South by any chance? :biggrin:
 

loseyourname

Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
1,717
5
Come on. There's no way this person was being serious. Birds can fly why? Because they have more faith than us?
 

BoulderHead

There are all kinds of 'thinking' in this world, even kinds you likely cannot imagine. Enjoy the diversity because there’s little you can do about it and such is, lol, the spice of life (pass the ammo box, please).
 

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,543
564
Well I considered it was a joke, but they signed a name and I looked it up in the phone book and it does exist. So it is not a made up name. It could be a prank someone played on someone who seems quite religious and signed this persons name to it. But there are some REAL strange people out there I can tell you.
 

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,543
564
Oh and loseyourname, I think the comment about divine will is that God decided that birds should fly so they do. Not that they have more faith.
 
133
0
Reminds me off a high school thesis someone wrote to get into my university as an undergraduate. It was hilariously wrong. He made claims that the inverse square law was clearly wrong because the atmosphere didn't follow it, even though he didn't cite any work saying so. Even funnier was when he made up some gravity-electron-space equation and he actually did cite work....FROM A PAPER HE WROTE. He included that paper too and it was equally bad.
 

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
174
Quoted approximately from one of my physics professors...

Before Newton came along, since the planets are seen moving across the night sky, many people believed that angels pushed the planets in the direction of motion observed. Then Newton came along and turned the angels by 90 degrees, so that they push the planets towards the sun instead. :biggrin:
 

plover

Homework Helper
187
0
Averagesupernova:

There is probably no theory so strange that someone might not believe it based on some religious justification. There are obviously those who reject Darwinian explanations for reasons of religous dogma – though in general, the ones who yammer about it loudly don't even understand the logic of Darwin's theory well enough to reject it coherently. There are also similar rejections of the Big Bang theory and Einstein's General Relativity, but those with this complaint haven't usually been intrusive enough to get much public attention.

Wholesale rejection of Newton is (to me anyway) a new one though. My first instinct is that the person might be schizophrenic or have temporal lobe problems, or in other words, there's no reason to believe that this person arrived at these ideas by a rational process – though without knowing more about the person there's no way to be completely sure. (And by a "rational process", I just mean one that isn't mostly a result of mental illness, i.e. even if the person is "rational", that wouldn't preclude them being stupider than dirt.) Also, at least in the bit that was quoted, there's no indication that the person is Christian. There's any amount of New Age type wackiness that could lead someone toward this kind of thinking.

I just hope someone is keeping this person away from ledges...
 

Bystander

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
5,114
1,121
Averagesupernova said:
(snip)I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin (translation: creationists) when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.
i.e., jump off a cliff.

Not the best bit of sarcasm ever submitted to an editorial page (seems to have gone over quite few heads) --- however, you must keep in mind the fact that editors do exercise certain license in tidying/tightening prose submitted to editorial pages --- it may have lost a bit in "translation."
 

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,543
564
Bystander said:
i.e., jump off a cliff.

Not the best bit of sarcasm ever submitted to an editorial page (seems to have gone over quite few heads) --- however, you must keep in mind the fact that editors do exercise certain license in tidying/tightening prose submitted to editorial pages --- it may have lost a bit in "translation."
Well enlighten me on your view in case it did go over my head. I read it as the writer hoping that those who believe in evolution jump off of a cliff. He is comparing shying away from creationalism (in his eyes considered a crazy idea) with thinking that gravity won't affect people (also a crazy idea).
 

plover

Homework Helper
187
0
Averagesupernova said:
Well enlighten me on your view in case it did go over my head. I read it as the writer hoping that those who believe in evolution jump off of a cliff. He is comparing shying away from creationalism (in his eyes considered a crazy idea) with thinking that gravity won't affect people (also a crazy idea).
In my response I was assuming there was more to the letter that made it clear the writer took this stuff seriously, but Bystander is right that for the quote as it stands there is a sarcastic reading that works too.

Something like this:
Darwin theories

I am appalled that so-called "scientists' continue to teach dangerous theories to our impressionable children as though these were unchallenged facts.

Basically, it rests on assuming the author has a double meaning in this first sentence – the language reflects that used by those who want creationism taught in schools, but as phrased, it could also be an expression of disgust by someone sick of hearing how some "scientists" (i.e. creationists calling themselves scientists) say that children should be taught "dangerous theories" (i.e. creationism).
Newton's theory of gravity, not law, says that things should fall down.
This second sentence about Newton is the most ambiguous and badly stated, but taken as a parody of creationist logic about Darwin could be read: "Newton's gravity – which is 'just a theory' [i.e. like Darwinism], not the law of the Creator – says that objects fall".
But clearly, the presence of birds, insects, clouds, etc., show the falseness of this theory.

Clearly things rise or fall based solely upon divine will. We do not float away because God chooses that we should not.

These sentences are then a continuation of the parody set up in the previous sentence.
I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.
In light of the above interpretation, this sentence assumes a double meaning also – as an extension of the parody it cautions against taking Newton seriously, but alongside the double meaning of the first sentence it can be read as an invitation to those who push "dangerous theories" on our children to, as Bystander said, "jump off a cliff".
 
728
13
Averagesupernova said:
Ok. I don't normally start new threads but I couldn't resist sharing this with you. On the opinion page of my local newspaper a reader wrote in the following:


Darwin theories

I am appalled that so-called "scientists' continue to teach dangerous theories to our impressionable children as though these were unchallenged facts. Newton's theory of gravity, not law, says that things should fall down. But clearly, the presence of birds, insects, clouds, etc., show the falseness of this theory.

Clearly things rise or fall based solely upon divine will. We do not float away because God chooses that we should not.

I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.




I can't really put into words what my opinion of this complete moron is. The writer talks about unchallenged facts and then comes with stupid non-sense about things rising and falling based upon divine will which is obviously lacking in credibility. I just can't put it into words...


must be in jesusland... o:)
 

Moonbear

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,349
51
Averagesupernova said:
I hope everyone who keeps an open mind about Darwin when approaching biology also will keep an open mind about Newton when approaching high ledges.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Yes, yes, if you believe evolution and gravity are unfounded facts, please do keep an open mind when approaching ledges. You can get a two-fer lesson if you do so...you'll learn about gravity and natural selection simultaneously! It's really a great suggestion, don't you think? :devil:
 

Averagesupernova

Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,543
564
Ok, I do see now that there is more sarcasm intended than what came across to me originally. Usually stuff like that doesn't go over my head, but it looks like this one flew WAY over the top. Other opinions are welcome.
 

Moonbear

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,349
51
Averagesupernova said:
Ok, I do see now that there is more sarcasm intended than what came across to me originally. Usually stuff like that doesn't go over my head, but it looks like this one flew WAY over the top. Other opinions are welcome.
That's okay, I missed it the first read through as well. I wonder if the editors really noticed or not? It's actually very clever, phrased so that if anyone complained to the paper for printing it, the editors could claim ignorance even if they did know what they were printing. :biggrin:
 
337
2
Averagesupernova said:
Newton's theory of gravity, not law, says that things should fall down. But clearly, the presence of birds, insects, clouds, etc., show the falseness of this theory.

Clearly things rise or fall based solely upon divine will. We do not float away because God chooses that we should not. [/I]
Hasn't this guy ever heard of a plane or a rocket before? :biggrin:

He probably doesn't even know why his shotgun shell "flies" when he fires the gun, thus using the above expression, he concludes that it is God's will to kill whatever target is in his sights. :rofl:
 

Gokul43201

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
6,987
14
motai said:
Hasn't this guy ever heard of a plane or a rocket before? :biggrin:
Your reasoning is easily defeated :

God wanted man to be able to fly around in planes and rockets, so he made them capable of flying (all the time fooling us into thinking it was Bernoulli or momentum conservation that was doing the trick).

He probably doesn't even know why his shotgun shell "flies" when he fires the gun, thus using the above expression, he concludes that it is God's will to kill whatever target is in his sights. :rofl:
No, it is only God's will to give the shotgun shell the ability to fly. God gives man the choice of pointing his barrel any which way he chooses. Point it at someone who believes in the same God, and you shall be condemned to the burning depths of Hell - unless of course, you repent. Point it at an interior decorator, and you shall be welcomed by angels.

All of the above is meant in jest...so I hope I'm not making any enemies.

Have I gone too far ? Is this kind of post allowed ? If not, please delete it and accept my apology....and warn me if you must - I won't forget that.
 

Evo

Mentor
22,872
2,349
Gokul43201 said:
No, it is only God's will to give the shotgun shell the ability to fly. God gives man the choice of pointing his barrel any which way he chooses. Point it at someone who believes in the same God, and you shall be condemned to the burning depths of Hell - unless of course, you repent. Point it at an interior decorator, and you shall be welcomed by angels.
I thought it should read "Point it at a mime, and you shall be welcomed by angels". :rofl:

All of the above is meant in jest...so I hope I'm not making any enemies.

Have I gone too far ? Is this kind of post allowed ? If not, please delete it and accept my apology....and warn me if you must - I won't forget that.
Sorry, no warning, it's straight to the burning depths of hell for you. :devil: :biggrin:
 

Chi Meson

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,767
10
plover said:
Averagesupernova:
Wholesale rejection of Newton is (to me anyway) a new one though. My first instinct is that the person might be schizophrenic or have temporal lobe problems, or in other words, there's no reason to believe that this person arrived at these ideas by a rational process – though without knowing more about the person there's no way to be completely sure. (And by a "rational process", I just mean one that isn't mostly a result of mental illness, i.e. even if the person is "rational", that wouldn't preclude them being stupider than dirt.) Also, at least in the bit that was quoted, there's no indication that the person is Christian. There's any amount of New Age type wackiness that could lead someone toward this kind of thinking.

I just hope someone is keeping this person away from ledges...
Hey, Averagesupernova

Did this writer say anything about "the Law of the Lever"? If he/she did it might answer a few questions. [smirk]
 
61
0
Hey Averagesupernova and to whomever else may care,

These people actually do exist! :surprised Take it from someone who is lives in 'Jesusland'! They are everywhere outside the major metropolitan areas and if you ever have the inclination to explore america's own heart of darkness, then I would suggest that Jesusland is the place to start! It is stranger than you can imagine!

As a sidenote just to let you know how strange it is, there is a theme park in Orlando called The Holy Land Experience. These people have constructed a real live Jesusland themepark! :surprised It gets even better, not only do they want to charge you 30 bucks for admission to their crappy little park, they had the gaul to petition for a tax exempt status because of their theme choice. Can you believe that! Of course this still has not happened, though I think they still are trying.
 
1,354
4
Moonbear said:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Yes, yes, if you believe evolution and gravity are unfounded facts, please do keep an open mind when approaching ledges. You can get a two-fer lesson if you do so...you'll learn about gravity and natural selection simultaneously! It's really a great suggestion, don't you think? :devil:

If that article was not a joke I am 1=not surprised that someone could be that stupid, 2= really hope he lives near high ledges.

BUt the last line about high ledges reads more like sarcasm, like he´s making fun of people like that. as for double meaning in the first line I don´t think so, and it unnecesary.
 
1,354
4
polyb said:
Hey Averagesupernova and to whomever else may care,

These people actually do exist! :surprised Take it from someone who is lives in 'Jesusland'! They are everywhere outside the major metropolitan areas and if you ever have the inclination to explore america's own heart of darkness, then I would suggest that Jesusland is the place to start! It is stranger than you can imagine!

As a sidenote just to let you know how strange it is, there is a theme park in Orlando called The Holy Land Experience. These people have constructed a real live Jesusland themepark! :surprised It gets even better, not only do they want to charge you 30 bucks for admission to their crappy little park, they had the gaul to petition for a tax exempt status because of their theme choice. Can you believe that! Of course this still has not happened, though I think they still are trying.
My soul dies a tortorouslly painful death at this.

IN the movie ¨For RIcher or Poorer¨they get berated by a judge for an idea like this. The burning bush in the model lit the judge's dress on fire.
 
1,488
21
Science and God don't mix: God keeps falling out of solution and falling to the bottom.

This kind of nonsensical thinking (that birds and clouds fly because God wills them too...) does more harm to the Christian religions than just accepting the scientific explanations.
 

Related Threads for: Are there really people like this?

  • Last Post
3
Replies
56
Views
23K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
4
Replies
92
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Top