Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Area / Length

  1. May 12, 2006 #1
    Is it meaningless to divide an area by a length?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 12, 2006 #2

    Tide

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    That depends! What are you trying to do?
     
  4. May 12, 2006 #3
    What does it depend on?

    Im not trying to do anything but understand and remove ambiguity in my understanding.
     
  5. May 12, 2006 #4

    Tide

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    It depends on what you are trying to do. E.g., if you know the area of a rectangle and the length of one side then dividing that area by the length of the known side has meaning - it's the width of the rectangle.
     
  6. May 12, 2006 #5
    Sometimes i wonder why God does not number his Jigsaw puzzles. When your missing the starting peices, the rest just keeps falling apart.

    Thx for the reply.
     
  7. May 12, 2006 #6

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Area of a chess board: 64 square inches.
    Length of the chess board: 8 inches.
    What is its width?
     
  8. May 12, 2006 #7
    It would also be meaningful if you were trying to maximize the ratio of the area contained within a curve to the lenght of the curve.

    SBRH
     
  9. May 12, 2006 #8
    i think spongebob hit it pretty close to answering the original question. There is a comparitive way to use a length to area, or an area to volume ratio. For example, for a given volume, what shape has the smallest surface area???? dimensionally, area divided by volume would give a result that is meaningless to understanding the answer to this question. im sure there is a more rigorous answer to this, but i havent studied it in any detail, so i have to rely on intuitive feel...
     
  10. May 16, 2006 #9
    :confused: area is a length squared so to divide an area by a length would only provide you with another length
     
  11. May 16, 2006 #10

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Why "only"? That's a worthwhile result!:rofl:
     
  12. May 16, 2006 #11

    dav2008

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    What does that even mean?
     
  13. May 16, 2006 #12
    If this is one of those "but what does it all MEAN??" questions, perhaps it should be on the philosophy board. Richard Feynman refrained from talking metaphysics, so i reckon trackstar gave a decent answer if your question was physical.
     
  14. May 16, 2006 #13
    a very good idea on his part :smile:

    "Why "only"? That's a worthwhile result!" cuz i think he might be talking about more than just numbers like it says above
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Area / Length
  1. Correlation length (Replies: 2)

  2. Is this arc length? (Replies: 3)

Loading...