- #1

- 672

- 0

## Homework Statement

Uploaded

## Homework Equations

Uploaded

## The Attempt at a Solution

I actually need someone to check my work for 1.1 and 1.2. Is what I have done in 1.3 correct I mean it does not seem right?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

UxIn summary, the conversation is discussing a series of problems involving vector calculations. The first problem involves finding the magnitude of a vector and using unit vectors in a cross product. The second problem involves determining parallel and perpendicular vectors using dot and cross products. The third problem involves finding the area of a triangle using cross products and dot products. The summary also includes the solutions provided by the expert for each problem.

- #1

- 672

- 0

Uploaded

Uploaded

I actually need someone to check my work for 1.1 and 1.2. Is what I have done in 1.3 correct I mean it does not seem right?

Physics news on Phys.org

- #2

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

For 1.1 (c), note that the items u

For 1.2, consider what vectors being parallel or perpendicular implies for their dot and cross products.

For 1.3, form two vectors that define the sides of the triangle and carry out the cross product. Then ##A = \frac{1}{2}|V_1 \times V_2|##.

- #3

- 672

- 0

Ok so the denominator for (b) should be 23.065. For (c) 8UxUyUz. For (d) -26UxUz. on 1.2 that is precisley what had me lost. I know that if they are parallel, then one vector must be a multiple of another. If perpendicular the dot product must result in a 0 and with alpha and beta only being tied to two terms. I struggle with how I can make this happen on the Z value for the parallel part. For part 1.3 A=48.489

- #4

- 672

- 0

AB dot AC = AB dot AC cos(theta) is how I find the angle right?

- #5

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

Sure. So what then are the components of the resulting vector?DODGEVIPER13 said:Ok so the denominator for (b) should be 23.065.

I don't understand that. The result of a cross product should be a vector.For (c) 8UxUyUz.

Part d contains a cross product followed by a dot product. The result should be a single scalar value.For (d) -26UxUz.

For the parallel vectors you can write x*A = B, for some scalar value x. Expand that and you'll see three equations. Solve for x (simple!). Use x to find ##\alpha## and ##\beta##.on 1.2 that is precisley what had me lost. I know that if they are parallel, then one vector must be a multiple of another. If perpendicular the dot product must result in a 0 and with alpha and beta only being tied to two terms. I struggle with how I can make this happen on the Z value for the parallel part.

Show your work; that's not the value I'm seeing.For part 1.3 A=48.489

EDIT: Sorry, I didn't see your attachments. Looking at your work for 1.3, I see that you've done something bizarre to find the vectors defining the triangle: you're multiplying the point components! A vector from point A to point B is given by V

For your cross products, the Ux, Uy, Uz stuff should ONLY appear in the top line of the determinant! Ux, Uy, and Uz designate the unit vectors of the vector space (or coordinate system axes). A vector written as: 3Ux + 5Uy -6Uz has Ux component 3, Uy component 5, and Uz component -6. It might also be written as: (3, 5, -6), with the understanding that those are the Ux, Uy, Uz components.

Last edited:

- #6

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

For two vectors A and B, ##A \cdot B = |A||B| cos(\theta)##DODGEVIPER13 said:AB dot AC = AB dot AC cos(theta) is how I find the angle right?

then ##cos(\theta) = \frac{A \cdot B}{|A||B|}##

Pay attention to the vector directions: you want to take the angle between pairs such that the vectors are diverging from the triangle vertex. It may help to sketch the triangle "flat" using the vector lengths as the sides. Identify the "points" with the vertices and the vector directions along the triangle sides. You'll know something went wrong if the angle sum is not 180°

- #7

- 672

- 0

- #8

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:

Your part (b) result looks fine.

For the cross products, take a look at the EDITs I added to post #5.

- #9

- 672

- 0

ok so X(Ux+3Uy-2Uz)=4Ux+Uy+8Uz then XUx+3XUy-2XUz = 4Ux+Uy+8Uz then Uz(-2x-8)=Ux(4-x)+(1-3x)Uy

- #10

- 672

- 0

How do I view the edits it still looks the same on my comp and BTW I can't read the code in #6

- #11

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:ok so X(Ux+3Uy-2Uz)=4Ux+Uy+8Uz then XUx+3XUy-2XUz = 4Ux+Uy+8Uz then Uz(-2x-8)=Ux(4-x)+(1-3x)Uy

What happened to the parameters ##\alpha## and ##\beta##? You should have:

##X(\alpha, 3, -2) = (4, \beta, 8)##

from which you have three equations if you equate the like components.

- #12

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:How do I view the edits it still looks the same on my comp and BTW I can't read the code in #6

If you refresh the page, the edits at the bottom of the post should appear.

By "code" I presume you mean the mathematical expressions rendered in LaTex? Perhaps your browser is not compatible with the Physics Forums' usage of LaTex? What type of machine/operating system are you using?

- #13

- 672

- 0

ok for c I get 6Uy+2Uz and for d I get -8

- #14

- 672

- 0

Ok after doing as you suggested if I did it right alpha=-1 and beta=-12 also x=-4

- #15

- 672

- 0

yah thanks the refresh worked

- #16

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:ok for c I get 6Uy+2Uz and for d I get -8

Check the signs on your expansion of the cross product for c. -8 for part d looks fine.

- #17

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:Ok after doing as you suggested if I did it right alpha=-1 and beta=-12 also x=-4

Right

- #18

- 672

- 0

ok my signs were off on (c) 6uy-2Uz

- #19

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:ok my signs were off on (c) 6uy-2Uz

I still see a sign problem with the first term...!

- #20

- 672

- 0

- #21

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:doh! so you are saying it is -6Uy-2Uz. Are you sure, I have checked it 3 times and feel confident in my initial answer?

The order of the cross product matters! A x B = - B x A. Your attachment shows that you're computing A x Ux...

- #22

- 672

- 0

Ok good point it should be after reworking it again -6Uy-2Uz

- #23

- 672

- 0

- #24

- 672

- 0

That is for the area of the triangle

- #25

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:to find magnitude (sqrt((-3)^2+(-30)^2+(-36)^2+(15)^2))/2 = 24.647

Ummm, why do you have two separate Uy terms? Your vector should have exactly three independent components.

- #26

- 672

- 0

Forgot to collect them up sorry now I get 25.719

- #27

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:Forgot to collect them up sorry now I get 25.719

Much better!

- #28

- 672

- 0

On 1.4 I think I am right but not sure? On 1.5 (a), (b), and (c) I am not sure if I did the partial derivatives correctly? On 1.6 Not sure if I computed the gradient right? On 1.7 not sure if i calculated the divergence right? On 1.8 I don't know what to do at all and need a bit of a push? I uploaded my work and the problem was in the first upload.

- #29

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

Having said that, I will address the "latest" problem, 1.4.

Note that you wish the dl's to follow along the given curve, y = x

- #30

- 672

- 0

Dy=2x

- #31

- 672

- 0

Now I get y^2-y

- #32

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:Dy=2x

##y = x^2##

##dy = 2x dx##

- #33

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:Now I get y^2-y

Show how. Your final result should be numeric.

- #34

- 672

- 0

Of 2xy^2 dx and got y^2 should I have turned y into x^2 and y^2 into x^4 hmm if I do that I get 0

- #35

Mentor

- 20,985

- 2,928

DODGEVIPER13 said:

Of 2xy^2 dx and got y^2 should I have turned y into x^2 and y^2 into x^4 hmm if I do that I get 0

I don't know why you'd do that first integral. The idea is to cast the dot product into terms of a single variable, and x is convenient. To do that you must replace the ##y^2## of the H function using ##y=x^2##.

Now, the path you want L to follow is along the other function ##y=x^2##. So then in terms of x, ##dy = 2x dx##. Make the substitutions and carry out the dot product. Then integrate over x. By substituting y and dy, you need only integrate over the one variable, x.

Share:

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 906

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 674

Engineering
Aspect Angle in the 3D Plane

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 2K

Engineering
Helmholtz pair, magnetic field in 3D

- Replies
- 13

- Views
- 2K

Engineering
Power Triangle and Power factor

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 18

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 813

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 785

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 2K