- #1
J77
- 1,096
- 1
I just searched arxiv for particular terms and had a look at some of the 'papers'.
Shocking stuff in there, eg. a few pages of well known, simple analysis on some model.
This doesn't constitute a paper. I thought you had to have recommendations to put your stuff up there - but what does this recommendation entail?
Is it worth having such an archive?
Particularly when most researchers have journal availability through their institute.
I see some good people on there, but also some things which looked like they've been knocked together overnight - and the whole presentation is sometimes very unprofessional - underlining of section titles etc.
Am I ranting now...
Shocking stuff in there, eg. a few pages of well known, simple analysis on some model.
This doesn't constitute a paper. I thought you had to have recommendations to put your stuff up there - but what does this recommendation entail?
Is it worth having such an archive?
Particularly when most researchers have journal availability through their institute.
I see some good people on there, but also some things which looked like they've been knocked together overnight - and the whole presentation is sometimes very unprofessional - underlining of section titles etc.
Am I ranting now...