- #1

marcus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 24,738

- 787

http://arxiv.org/new/physics.html

Jacques Distler alerts us to this, on his blog.

The advisory committee has proposed a whole different bunch of categories

quantum field theory on CURVED spacetime is here:

"physics.GR Gravity (Donald Marolf, Matt Visser)

general relativity and related theories, numerical and experimental results, black holes, gravity waves, quantum gravity, quantum field theory in curved space-time (gr-qc)"

other quantum field theory is here:

"physics.HT High-Energy -- Field Theory and String Theory (Jacques Distler, Paul Fendley)

quantum field theory, supersymmetry and supergravity, conformal field theory, string theory, M-theory (hep-th)"

so we will have to see whether Smolin and Loll choose to post with other field theory or with field theory specifically on curved spacetimes.

THERE IS NO proposed background independent field theory category where you do field theories on a spacetime which is NEITHER CURVED NOR FLAT nor anything specified in advance but which is dynamic.

A lot of the papers to be presented at Loops 05 conference have to do with including MATTER in a background independent/nonperturbative way. Like for example here are a Freidel abstract

http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_freidel.html

and a Rovelli abstract

http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_rovelli.html

So if one is doing quantum matter fields on a new-type spacetime which is neither curved nor flat but is a quantum object, then where does one post one's research.

Looks like it is expected to be segregated from string theory in the new proposed setup. Looks like by its description "physics.HT" explicitly designates string/M and tacitly redirects competing alternatives, whatever they might be e.g. spinfoam, CDT, Loop.

one of the moderators for physics.HT is Jacques Distler himself

We will see how it sorts out. It should be interesting to watch.

Jacques Distler alerts us to this, on his blog.

The advisory committee has proposed a whole different bunch of categories

quantum field theory on CURVED spacetime is here:

"physics.GR Gravity (Donald Marolf, Matt Visser)

general relativity and related theories, numerical and experimental results, black holes, gravity waves, quantum gravity, quantum field theory in curved space-time (gr-qc)"

other quantum field theory is here:

"physics.HT High-Energy -- Field Theory and String Theory (Jacques Distler, Paul Fendley)

quantum field theory, supersymmetry and supergravity, conformal field theory, string theory, M-theory (hep-th)"

**In the past Lee Smolin and Renate Loll have mostly been posting in HEP-TH, which becomes physics.HT, and other quantum gravity people have been mostly posting in GR-QC, which becomes physics.GR**so we will have to see whether Smolin and Loll choose to post with other field theory or with field theory specifically on curved spacetimes.

THERE IS NO proposed background independent field theory category where you do field theories on a spacetime which is NEITHER CURVED NOR FLAT nor anything specified in advance but which is dynamic.

A lot of the papers to be presented at Loops 05 conference have to do with including MATTER in a background independent/nonperturbative way. Like for example here are a Freidel abstract

http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_freidel.html

and a Rovelli abstract

http://loops05.aei.mpg.de/index_files/abstract_rovelli.html

So if one is doing quantum matter fields on a new-type spacetime which is neither curved nor flat but is a quantum object, then where does one post one's research.

Looks like it is expected to be segregated from string theory in the new proposed setup. Looks like by its description "physics.HT" explicitly designates string/M and tacitly redirects competing alternatives, whatever they might be e.g. spinfoam, CDT, Loop.

one of the moderators for physics.HT is Jacques Distler himself

We will see how it sorts out. It should be interesting to watch.

Last edited: