Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
In summary, the paper discusses the possibility of black hole bounce and how it could be a factor in determining UK downloads by the end of the year.

How many UK downloads of A & B's black hole paper by year-end 2005?

  • under 40

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 40-59

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 80-99

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 100-119

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 120+

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
This could be a widely-read paper.

http://www.arxiv.org/gr-qc/0509075
Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald

How many UK downloads should be expected by year-end?

under 40
40-59
60-79
80-99
100-119
120+

Here is a PF thread discussing this paper.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89885
"Black hole bounce comes out of the closet."
(the paper reports a result that has been speculated about for some time)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
the reason it is UK downloads is that the UK mirror site of arXiv
counts how many people download the PDF

So if someone wants to read the A and B paper and they go to
http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0509075
and click on PDF
then that gets counted and you can see how many did that (when the count gets updated from time to time).

But if they go to the usual arXiv site and do the same thing it is not counted.
 
  • #3
marcus said:
This could be a widely-read paper.

http://www.arxiv.org/gr-qc/0509075
Quantum geometry and the Schwarzschild singularity
Abhay Ashtekar, Martin Bojowald

How many UK downloads should be expected by year-end?

under 40
40-59
60-79
80-99
100-119
120+

Here is a PF thread discussing this paper.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=89885
"Black hole bounce comes out of the closet."
(the paper reports a result that has been speculated about for some time)

Marcus, as soon as the implications are realized from the paper, then as soon as an academic asks the question:So what happens in a Stella Collapse, as the compacting information reaches the Blackhole Event horizon, some of the "information" will NOT transverse this horizon, so cosmological evidence should be available to this fact?

For instance again, photons streaming towards the BH will go "straight through", thus a Galactic Blackhole will radiate rigorously!..as quite a lot of light will not be absorbed into the Event Horizon.

So this image for instance:http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/gal_milky.html

really is showing a high number of photons that have passed right through the Galactic core Blackhole, and therefore due to the fact that the have passed through in every direction, and also emerge from ever direction?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Spin_Network said:
Marcus, as soon as the implications are realized from the paper,...

Hi Spin N,
After thinking about it, I decided to go along with your prediction of 60-79 and will join you in that bracket. Too bad not to have more spread, but that is what I think the UK hits will be.

Your picture showing a galaxy's glowing central bulge is nice but I don't see how visible light could return out of a massive BH. So I probably either don't understand your discussion of the picture or would disagree that it has to do with A/B's paper.

I think what they show is growing evidence of a mathematical similarity or compatibility between LQG pictures of Hole and Bang-----so that, although there might not be a connection, there could be one (a technical possibility in the LQG picture). but if there is a connection from Hole to Bang, then it has to be an absolutely ONE-WAY bridge, as I understand it.

because time goes inwards to the Hole and outwards from the Bang. nothing could fight the flow of time and go back to his own big bang and fight his way thru the quantum bridge and come out the prior black hole---so it's like a oneway valve connection.
 
  • #5
http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:gr-qc/0509075

I checked today to see how the Ash-Bo paper is doing and found that it already has 16 hits.

this is pretty good. UK downloads are presumably just a small fraction of total downloads worldwide (at the main arxiv site and all mirror sites) and the paper only came out a few days ago----I think it posted on Monday 19 September, just one week ago today.

any new guesses as to what the count will be by 31 December?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

What is the significance of the Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end?

The Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end refer to a prediction made by physicists Abhay Ashtekar and Martin Bojowald that the loop quantum gravity theory will have significant breakthroughs by the end of a given year. This theory is a proposed solution to the problem of combining the principles of general relativity and quantum mechanics.

Why are scientists interested in loop quantum gravity theory?

Loop quantum gravity theory is a promising approach to unifying the principles of general relativity and quantum mechanics, which are currently incompatible. Its development could potentially lead to a better understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe and help us answer important questions about the nature of space and time.

What is the current progress on loop quantum gravity theory?

The development of loop quantum gravity theory is an ongoing process and there have been several significant advancements in recent years. However, it is still a work in progress and there is no consensus on its validity among the scientific community. The Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end prediction is based on the expectation that there will be even more progress in the near future.

What are the potential implications of the Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end prediction?

If the loop quantum gravity theory is successfully developed and proven to be accurate, it could have a major impact on our understanding of the universe and possibly even lead to new technologies. It could also potentially provide a resolution to long-standing problems in physics such as the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics.

Is there any evidence to support the Ashtekar-Bojowald hits by year-end prediction?

There is no concrete evidence to support this specific prediction, as it is based on the opinions and insights of the two physicists. However, there have been significant advancements in loop quantum gravity theory in recent years, which could potentially support this prediction. Only time will tell if the prediction holds true.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
20
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top