Assault Intervention Device

  • News
  • Thread starter SixNein
  • Start date
  • #1
SixNein
Gold Member
42
16
I would not agree with this device being used over seas much less in our own jail systems.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_jail_ray_gun [Broken]

Why don't we just launch an inquisitor program?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
russ_watters
Mentor
19,948
6,440
How is it different, ethically, from pepper spray? And what does it have to do with an "inquisitor program"?
 
  • #3
SixNein
Gold Member
42
16
How is it different, ethically, from pepper spray? And what does it have to do with an "inquisitor program"?
I don't think it has anything to do with an inquisitor program, but I wanted to over-exaggerate to get the comments rolling =p

Should a device with these capabilities be deployed in jails? I would argue maybe to prisons, but I'm not sure it belongs in jails.

According to a blog at wired, a test person was seriously injured by the device:

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/aclu-blasts-jailhouse-pain-ray-condemns-star-wars-tech/

But they may have fixed it?
 
  • #4
Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,019
228
If the device is deployed, eventually, it will end up being used to scatter protesters
First, that's not obvious at all. But let's assume so.

As opposed to dropping tear gas and beating people into submission? Explain why this is worse because there is a small risk of being burned. And the test subject who was burned was burned because of the device being turned to a too powerful level (beyond what it was supposed to be set to for the scenario in question)

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/files/danger_room.PDF
 
  • #5
russ_watters
Mentor
19,948
6,440
Should a device with these capabilities be deployed in jails? I would argue maybe to prisons, but I'm not sure it belongs in jails.

According to a blog at wired, a test person was seriously injured by the device:

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/08/aclu-blasts-jailhouse-pain-ray-condemns-star-wars-tech/

But they may have fixed it?
Fixed what? Was it broken? Yes, I think it should be used in jails. But I won't explain until you do: this is your thread and it is your responsibility to get the discussion going by explaining your point.
 
  • #6
SixNein
Gold Member
42
16
First, that's not obvious at all. But let's assume so.

As opposed to dropping tear gas and beating people into submission? Explain why this is worse because there is a small risk of being burned. And the test subject who was burned was burned because of the device being turned to a too powerful level (beyond what it was supposed to be set to for the scenario in question)

http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/files/danger_room.PDF
They must have released some details on the issue. I'm still reading up on it.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
SixNein
Gold Member
42
16
Fixed what? Was it broken? Yes, I think it should be used in jails. But I won't explain until you do: this is your thread and it is your responsibility to get the discussion going by explaining your point.
I couldn't find any details on the accident outline in the story, but the poster before you had found one. Apparently, someone set the device too high and caused the test subject to have 2nd degree burns. Apparently, the device had been used by untrained people and without all of the proper equipment.

So the story is much to do about nothing.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Hurkyl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
14,916
19
I don't think it has anything to do with an inquisitor program, but I wanted to over-exaggerate to get the comments rolling =p
You know that's called "trolling", right?
 
  • #9
SixNein
Gold Member
42
16
You know that's called "trolling", right?
When the story first came out, the story was exaggerated with comments like "noting that early military versions resulted in five airmen suffering lasting burns."

Oh well, if you have moderate powers... go ahead and lock or delete the thread.
 

Related Threads on Assault Intervention Device

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
107
Views
13K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
970
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Top