I ran across the following statement, in a tutorial on logic,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If R is an asymmetric relation then R is antisymmetric.

Perhaps, the above is true. I will attempt to argue it is not. Okay, then suppose R really is asymmetric, for example the relation (<) So for an arbitrary (c,d) c < d then d >= c. From this we should get R is antisymmetric. It R is antisymmetric though, ( c < d and d < c then d = c )

Take for example the natural numbers, suppose 1. 1 < x and x < 1 means 1 = x. Which would mean that 1 is less than 1, and 1 is greater than 1, which poses contradiction because 1 is not less than 1.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Asymmetry versus antisymmetry

Loading...

Similar Threads for Asymmetry versus antisymmetry | Date |
---|---|

I Standard Deviation Versus Sample Size & T-Distribution | Dec 20, 2017 |

I Independent versus dependent pdf | Dec 5, 2017 |

Asymmetry between probability distributions | Sep 4, 2015 |

Factor analysis versus Baye`s estimates? | May 19, 2015 |

Classic model relation versus the Kripke model relation | Mar 29, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**