Asymptotic analysis question

  • Thread starter mhill
  • Start date
  • #1
188
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

let be [tex] f(x) \sim g(x) [/tex] , in the sense that for big x f(x) is asymptotic to g(x) , my question if what happens to their Laplace transform ??

i belive that [tex] \int _{0}^{\infty}dt f(t)exp(-st) \approx \int _{0}^{\infty}dt g(t)exp(-st) [/tex]

in first approximation the Laplace transform of f(x) and the Laplace transform of g(x) must be equal.

another question if we had a Linear operator L so we can define its inverse L^{-1} is it true that [tex] f(x) \sim L(g(x)) \rightarrow L^{-1} f(x)= g(x) [/tex]
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,792
920
The answer to your first question is "what do you mean by [itex]\approx[/itex]?". The difference between f and g may be extremely large for small x: and that difference will show up in the integral.

As for your second question- isn't that the definition of "inverse"?
 
  • #3
188
1
Yes Hallsoftivy L^{-1} means the inverse operator, but is it valid even for asymptotic relations ?? , and as for the Laplace integral if f(x) is asymptotic to g(x) and the Laplace transform of f(x) and g(x) are denoted by F(s) G(s) then would be true that [tex] F(s) \sim G(s) [/tex] ?, but i believe that having a kernel inside the integral transform exp(-st) for big values of 's' the remainder of the asymptotic relation could be make smoother
 

Related Threads for: Asymptotic analysis question

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Top