Speed Of Light In Relation To The Size Of The Universe

In summary, the conversation discusses the question of whether it is possible to observe the entire universe, given its immense size and the limitations of light speed. It is explained that due to the expansion of the universe, objects that emit light in the opposite direction of our galaxy may never reach us, making it impossible to observe them. Additionally, it is pointed out that the concept of a "center" in the universe is incorrect, as the big bang happened everywhere. The conversation concludes with an explanation of how light from the early universe has had to travel a longer distance due to the expansion of space.
  • #1
CowedbyWisdom
14
0
Hello Everyone. This is my first post started on this site. Please, please, please excuse my ignorance but I couldn't seem to find the answer to my question online (although I'm sure it is). If the size of the know universe has a diameter of 93 billion lightyears with a radius in accordance to us being half of that, does that make it impossible for the light (suns/galaxies) of a great deal of the "observable universe" nonobservant? If this is true how do we observe what hasn't reached us yet? Thank you very much for reading and for any responses.

-Jack
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Big bang happened 13.7 billion years ago, and from that moment inflation expanded time and space a great deal in all direction along with energy flying out in all directions away from the 'center'. I don't know the radius of the universe so I can't answere one of your main questions. However the milky way galaxy, along with almost all objects in the universe, are traveling at speeds near the speed of light away from the starting point. The universe is also undergoing expansion, meaning not only is everything traveling as fast as it was a billions of years ago, its accelerating at a relatively even pase. Because of this, objects that emit light that are traveling in the opposite direction then our galaxy is headed light will not reach us. The combined speed of us and other universes traveling away end up being significantly faster then the speed of light.

Picture 2 cars going the speed limit of 50 mph, and 'light speed' is the speed limit of 50. If those cars are driving perfectly away from one another the combined speed is 100mph and it is impossible for another car to travel this gap without going faster then 100.

So yes, it is reasonable to say their are parts of the universe we will never be able to observe. We call the 'observable universe' just that because their may very well be a significant amount happening just past it's edges, we just can't see.

Edit: You would also probably like to know that light emitted from a galaxy that is 10 billion light years away and currently visible may not be in the observable sky in the next 10 billion years due to the rapid pase of acceleration the universe is undergoing.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Rorkster2 said:
and from that moment inflation expanded time and space a great deal in all direction along with energy flying out in all directions away from the 'center'. [...] However the milky way galaxy, along with almost all objects in the universe, are traveling at speeds near the speed of light away from the starting point.
No! This is wrong, and it leads to many misconceptions.
There is no center, and no object is moving with any significant velocity.
See the balloon analogy for a discussion.

The objects which are now ~46 billion light years away were much closer in the past, and space expanded between them and the traveling light, too.
 
  • #4
CowedbyWisdom said:
Hello Everyone. This is my first post started on this site. Please, please, please excuse my ignorance but I couldn't seem to find the answer to my question online (although I'm sure it is). If the size of the know universe has a diameter of 93 billion lightyears with a radius in accordance to us being half of that, does that make it impossible for the light (suns/galaxies) of a great deal of the "observable universe" nonobservant? If this is true how do we observe what hasn't reached us yet? Thank you very much for reading and for any responses.

-Jack

Is your question why, even though the universe is only 13.7 billion years old, we can see light from roughly 46.5 billion light years away?

If so, the answer is that the universe has expanded considerably in the past 13 billion years. So, the light from the early universe not only travels the 13.7 billion light years (because the universe is 13.7 billion years old), but it must also traverse extra distance that is created by the expansion of the universe. Put yourself in the position of light - imagine trying to run across a large field that is, say, 1000 meters long. If the field was to start expanding while you were running, it would be much larger than 1000 meters when you reach the end. Say that it grows to 2000 meters. So, you've traveled much farther than just the normal 1000 meters, because the field has expanded.

The situation is similar for light. The light is from 13.7 billion years ago, but it has had to travel 46.5 billion light years to reach us.
 
  • #5
mfb said:
No! This is wrong, and it leads to many misconceptions.
There is no center, and no object is moving with any significant velocity.
See the balloon analogy for a discussion.

The objects which are now ~46 billion light years away were much closer in the past, and space expanded between them and the traveling light, too.

When I say 'center' I'm referring to the point in which the big bang occurred, which we can roughly infer from the cosmic microwave background
 
  • #6
Rorkster2 said:
When I say 'center' I'm referring to the point in which the big bang occurred, which we can roughly infer from the cosmic microwave background

Nonsense. There was no "point" where the BB happened, it happened everwhere. The universe has no center, just the observable universe.

See:

www.phinds.com/balloonanalogy
 
  • #7
Rorkster2 said:
When I say 'center' I'm referring to the point in which the big bang occurred, which we can roughly infer from the cosmic microwave background

As Phinds said, there is no center, as the big bang was not a 'bang'. It happened everywhere. This is the essential story of what happens:

1) The very early universe is hot, dense, and filled with radiation. This isn't concentrated to a single point, it's everywhere. It's also homogeneous, it's the same everywhere.

2) The universe expands. By this, I mean that the metric of space itself is expanding at every point. The distance in between everything grows. It doesn't 'expand into' anything. See more about this on phinds balloon analogy page. This causes the radiation to cool, and the plasma to break up into gas. The slightly denser regions of gas pull the rest in, while the space around them expands, isolating them from each other. These develop into galaxies.

That's the gist of the story. No explosion, no center.
 
  • #8
Let's take the CMB, for example - which is now at a proper distance of about 46 billion light years. When the CMB photons we now receive were emitted, the source of those protons were only about 42 million light years away [again, proper distance]. The recession velocity of the source of those photons was about 65 times the speed of light at that time, so, it took a very long time [about 13.7 billion years] for those photons to span what was originally a distance of 42 million light years. The photons being emitted NOW by the CMB source will never reach us because those sources have long since left our cosmological event horizon. In the LCDM model this is true of any object with a current redshift exceeding about 1.8 [the CMB redshift is about 1100].
 
  • #9
Thanks guy's you have answered my question sufficiently about that.

-Jack
 

1. What is the speed of light and why is it important in relation to the size of the universe?

The speed of light is a fundamental constant in physics, denoted by the letter c. It is the speed at which light travels in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second. In relation to the size of the universe, the speed of light is important because it is the fastest speed at which any object or information can travel. This means that the distance light has traveled in the universe can give us insight into the size and age of the universe.

2. How is the speed of light related to the expansion of the universe?

The speed of light is closely related to the expansion of the universe through the theory of general relativity. According to this theory, the speed of light is the maximum speed at which any matter or energy can travel, including the expansion of space itself. This means that as the universe expands, the space between objects also expands, but the speed of light remains constant.

3. Can the speed of light ever be exceeded?

According to our current understanding of physics, the speed of light is the absolute limit for the speed of anything in the universe. This is because as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass increases and it requires an infinite amount of energy to accelerate it further. Therefore, it is not possible for anything to travel faster than the speed of light.

4. How does the speed of light impact our ability to observe distant objects in the universe?

The speed of light plays a crucial role in our ability to observe distant objects in the universe. Since light takes time to travel, the farther away an object is, the longer it takes for its light to reach us. This means that when we look at objects that are billions of light-years away, we are seeing them as they were billions of years ago. Therefore, the speed of light allows us to look back in time and study the evolution of the universe.

5. Does the speed of light vary in different parts of the universe?

Based on our current understanding, the speed of light is a universal constant and does not vary in different parts of the universe. However, there are some theories that suggest the speed of light may have been different in the early stages of the universe or could potentially vary in extreme environments such as near black holes. These theories are still being researched and studied by scientists.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
371
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
624
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
425
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
926
Back
Top