Atheist Apology: Examining "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency

  • Thread starter jma2001
  • Start date
Additionally, the argument relies heavily on the concept of "omnipotent agency" which may not be universally accepted. It is also unclear how this argument would hold up against counterarguments.
  • #1
jma2001
Gold Member
91
0
Since the subject of atheism has been discussed here recently, I am hoping for some feedback on the following page (not mine, just something I found in a search years ago):

http://home.cshore.com/himes/dennis/aaa.htm

There are lots of interesting arguments here, but I am specifically looking for reaction to the argument labeled "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency". I have read this several times over the years, but I can't quite figure out what he is getting at. There has been a lot of discussion about it on his commentary page, but that only confused me even more. Can anyone tell whether this argument is valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
"The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" seems like the author's attempt to prove the omnipotence paradox. But the author's approach seems awkward and unnecessarily long.
 
  • #3


The argument presented in "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" is a common one used by atheists to refute the concept of an all-powerful deity. Essentially, the argument states that the concept of an omnipotent being is self-contradictory and therefore cannot exist.

The main premise of the argument is that an omnipotent being should be able to do anything, including creating a rock that it cannot lift. However, if the being can create such a rock, then it is not all-powerful because it cannot lift the rock. On the other hand, if the being cannot create the rock, then it is also not all-powerful because it is limited in its abilities.

This argument relies on the assumption that omnipotence means the ability to do anything, without any limitations or contradictions. However, this is a flawed understanding of omnipotence. The concept of omnipotence does not mean the ability to do anything, but rather the ability to do anything that is logically possible. Creating a rock that the being cannot lift is a logical contradiction, and therefore falls outside the realm of omnipotence.

Furthermore, this argument also assumes that an omnipotent being must be able to do everything at once. However, this is not a necessary characteristic of an all-powerful being. Just because an omnipotent being has the ability to do something, it does not mean that it must exercise that ability at all times.

Ultimately, this argument fails to take into account the complexities of the concept of omnipotence and reduces it to a simplistic understanding. It also relies on a narrow definition of omnipotence and ignores the possibility of different interpretations. Therefore, it is not a valid argument against the existence of an all-powerful deity.
 

FAQ: Atheist Apology: Examining "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency

1. What is "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" and why is it important to examine?

"The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" refers to the question of whether an omnipotent being, such as a deity, can truly have agency or free will if they are all-powerful. This is an important question to examine because it challenges the traditional concept of omnipotence and raises questions about the nature of deity and their ability to make choices.

2. Can an atheist believe in the existence of an omnipotent being?

Yes, an atheist can believe in the existence of an omnipotent being, but they do not necessarily have to. Atheism simply means lack of belief in a deity, so an atheist may choose to believe in an omnipotent being or not based on their own personal beliefs and interpretations.

3. How does the concept of "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" relate to atheism?

This concept is often discussed in relation to atheism because it challenges the idea of an all-powerful deity, which is a central belief in many religious traditions. Atheists may use this contradiction as evidence against the existence of a deity, while believers may use it as a way to deepen their understanding of their faith.

4. Can the concept of "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" be applied to other belief systems, not just theism?

Yes, the idea of a contradiction between omnipotence and agency can also be applied to other belief systems that involve a powerful being or force. For example, it could be applied to the concept of fate or destiny in certain philosophical or spiritual beliefs.

5. How can examining "The Contradiction of Omnipotent Agency" contribute to our understanding of the world and ourselves?

Examining this concept can help us to challenge and critically evaluate our beliefs about the nature of deity and free will. It can also lead to deeper philosophical and existential questions about the meaning of life and the role of agency in our lives. Overall, it encourages critical thinking and reflection, which can contribute to personal growth and understanding of the world around us.

Similar threads

Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
416
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
333
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top