Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Atomic model's

  1. Nov 9, 2003 #1
    Please, take a look on my atomic-model based on that
    a universe in wich every point can be counted as an origo, must be a net.

    My atomic model

    You can also read the rest of my theory on http://www.quantumnet-string.tk [Broken]

    This explains the math around the atom, right?

    Through this pictures, we obtain that neither the classical or the modern atomic model is correct. Do you agree?
    http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/classical_atomic_orbit.gif [Broken]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 9, 2003 #2

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    The modern model of the atom works quite well.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 1, 2017
  4. Nov 9, 2003 #3

    FZ+

    User Avatar

    Er... Bohr isn't exactly the modern model of the atom...
     
  5. Nov 10, 2003 #4
    Re: Re: Atomic model's

    if boblock was right,
    aa
    bb
    would lead to
    a bb a
    since b attracts b and a repells a were b is sink and a is source.
    Let's say this is a primitive sort of helium atom.
    If two b are on a certain distance from eachother, it is discovered that they move from eachother:
    <-- b b -->
    This is due of advanced net physic, and it's not my case to crack.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 13, 2003
  6. Nov 10, 2003 #5
    No, but... the only difference is the presumed orbit. Mathematically there are no greater differences.
     
  7. Nov 10, 2003 #6

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I didn't mean to imply it was. Just take my statement as-is.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Atomic model's
  1. About the atomic model (Replies: 2)

  2. Nuclear atomic model (Replies: 1)

Loading...