Australian embassy bombing

  • News
  • Thread starter Adam
  • Start date
  • #101
7
0
russ_watters said:
A drunk driver (who kills somene) is a murderer, not a terrorist. Again, not all murder is terrorism.
But all terrorism is murder. So, by inference, all terrorists are murderers. Quid pro quo?
 
  • #102
5
0
maps said:
But all terrorism is murder. So, by inference, all terrorists are murderers. Quid pro quo?
Sure terrorists are murderers. But its the ppl that survive who suffer from the terrorism, and i just dont go around the hood scared ****less of drunk drivers or cars.
 
  • #103
russ_watters
Mentor
20,158
6,677
maps said:
But all terrorism is murder. So, by inference, all terrorists are murderers. Quid pro quo?
Quid pro quo isn't the right phrase there. You're looking for something that says if all terrorists are murderers, all murderers are terrorists. Sorry, but it just ain't so any more than saying all football players are athletes means all athletes are football players.
 
  • #104
356
3
Adam said:
Don't you just love how certain users have turned this thread, too, into a "Muslims are bad, mmkay" thread?
Love the way they're doing that on all these threads.
 

Related Threads on Australian embassy bombing

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
16K
Replies
72
Views
6K
Top