Advice on Authorship Problem for Research Team

  • Thread starter sperelat
  • Start date
In summary, a member of the team is worried about the problem of authorship. They feel that the group leader did not contribute substantially to the design of the investigation, the data generation/collection, or the interpretation of the results, and that it is difficult to decide as an outsider whether or not the group has met the threshold for authorship.
  • #1
sperelat
7
0
I feel that a research team I personaly know have some authorship problem.

But since I'm still a beginner in research field,I cannot conclude definitely.

In that team, there are several research groups.

Boss of the team gets funding for the whole research team, but don't contribute

to every group's work

A group in the team is planning to add the Boss's name as the last author for a research

he is not actually involved, because doing so will make it possible to maintain the whole

team's funding.

(Not to maintain his fame)

I'm not sure if this kind of habit is kind of academic authorship problem.

My feeling is that "it is", but other people don't think so.

I can't conclude about this issue.

A member in the group is worrying much about this problem.

Can anyone give some advice to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This can be a tricky issue.

In my field the criteria for authorship are that all authors need to have made significant contributions to the design of the investigation, the data generation/collection, and interpretation of the results. Naturally such criteria leaves room for interpretation, however one general consensus is that simply being a member of a group, does not constitute inclusion in authorship in everything published by that group.

On the other hand, as a junior member of a group, sometimes it can be difficult to understand contributions made by group leaders. Procuring funding often entails outlining the project and generating preliminary results. Further, directing a group means ensuring that the right people are in the right places and that they have the right tools to carry out the investigation.

What complicates things is the simple fact that marching into the office of the person who pays you (and is likely going to give you a reference for your next position when you're a student or a post-doc) and questioning that person's contributions can be what is colloquially known as a "career-limiting move."

In general, authorship is something that, in my experience, is left largely to the group to decide internally. Journal editors will establish criteria for authorship, but they don't have any means to referee anything beyond the content of the manuscript.

One suggestion to help with this issue (especially among larger groups) is to institute a formal internal review process, part of which assesses the contributions of potential authors against the standards established by both the journals in the relevant field and the academic community in general. Encourage your institution to develop a written set of standards that must be met to constitute authorship. That way, any objections you may want to bring into the light will have something more than just opinion to be measured against.
 
  • #3
If it's not your research team, it's not really your business, is it? Also, it's very difficult to decide as an outsider to a group who has and who has not met the threshold for authorship.

It's also not obvious that the group leader did not substantially contribute. It may be true, but it's not obvious. Did he design the experiment? A critical piece of equipment? What was his role in guiding the experiment?
 
  • #4
sperelat said:
I feel that a research team I personaly know have some authorship problem.

<snip>
A group in the team is planning to add the Boss's name as the last author for a research

he is not actually involved, because doing so will make it possible to maintain the whole

team's funding.

<snip>

A member in the group is worrying much about this problem.

Can anyone give some advice to this problem?

I second Vanadium 50- if you are not part of the group, then don't get involved. Unfortunately, it is a more common practice than we like to admit- I know of two large research centers, the head of whom is last author on every paper that goes out the door. This is bad practice, but my only recourse is not to collaborate with them.
 
  • #5
Andy Resnick said:
I second Vanadium 50- if you are not part of the group, then don't get involved. Unfortunately, it is a more common practice than we like to admit- I know of two large research centers, the head of whom is last author on every paper that goes out the door. This is bad practice, but my only recourse is not to collaborate with them.

Yes... This is the most common procedure for directors in many research groups.. hehe. No wonder, they have so many papers published!
 

1. How do I determine authorship for a research team?

Authorship for a research team should be determined based on the individual's contributions to the project. This can include the conception and design of the study, data collection and analysis, and writing and revising the manuscript. It is important to have open communication and clear expectations within the team to ensure fair and accurate authorship.

2. What should be done if there is a disagreement over authorship?

If there is a disagreement over authorship, it is important to have a discussion and try to come to a resolution. This may involve seeking input from a supervisor or department head, or using a predetermined authorship agreement. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the individual's contributions to the project.

3. Can authorship be changed after the research has been completed?

Authorship should not be changed after the research has been completed, unless there are exceptional circumstances such as misconduct or significant errors that affect the validity of the study. It is important to establish authorship before the research is published to avoid any potential conflicts.

4. How should authorship be credited in a multi-authored publication?

In a multi-authored publication, authorship should be credited based on each individual's contributions to the project. This can be done by listing authors in order of their contributions or by using a footnote or statement to explain each person's role. It is important to be transparent and acknowledge the contributions of all team members.

5. Are there any ethical considerations when determining authorship for a research team?

Yes, there are ethical considerations when determining authorship for a research team. It is important to give credit where credit is due and to accurately reflect each individual's contributions to the project. This can help prevent issues such as plagiarism, misrepresentation of work, and disputes over credit. It is also important to have open and honest communication within the team to ensure fair and ethical authorship practices.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
366
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
820
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
939
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
479
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
936
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
600
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top