Autopiotherapy, etc. -- coined, or standard?

  • Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Standard
In summary, the article discusses immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer, mentioning terms such as "autopiotherapy" which are not commonly found on Google. The question arises whether this term is a mistranslation, a newly coined word, or pseudoscientific technobabble. Further research reveals that the correct spelling is "autopyotherapy" and it was first mentioned in a medical journal in 1923. While not widely used, it is considered a legitimate term in the field.
  • #1
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,668
203
TL;DR Summary
In an article cited, a number of terms are used that I do not find via a Google search; the article was written in English by Russians, and perhaps these terms are just incorrectly translated from Russian, or maybe they are just coined, or pseudoscience, or some combination. Are these standard terms in English?
In the article https://medicia.ru/en/immunoterapiya-pri-lechenii-raka-immunoterapiya-chto-nuzhno/, terms such as "autopiotherapy" are used which Google does not give elsewhere. Many legitimate standard terms, of course, are not known to Google. But I did not find, for example, "autopiotherapy" for the re-introduction of a patient's pus, anywhere except on this page. Given that this is an English variation of a Russian page, could someone tell me whether, on the example of "autopiotherapy", this is (a) a mistranslation (because a simple transliteration from the Russian), for which there is a proper term in English (pus transplant?), (b) a coined word that is valid but not yet widespread because the field is new or very restricted, or (c) pseudoscientific technobabble?
If possible, the same question for any of the other unfamiliar terms on that page. Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #3
Ah, a fourth possibility that I hadn't thought of! Thanks very much, Andy Resnick! :woot: Wow, 1923... with the correct spelling, there are still not many references to it around, but at least I know that it is a legitimate word. (Whether the associated practice is any good is another question, of course, but as Michael Ende said at the end of his chapters in "The Never-Ending Story", "...but that is another story and shall be told another time.")
 

1. What is Autopiotherapy?

Autopiotherapy is a term coined by Dr. John Upledger to describe a form of therapy that focuses on self-healing and self-regulation of the body. It involves a combination of manual therapy techniques, such as craniosacral therapy, and mind-body techniques, such as guided imagery, to help individuals tap into their own innate healing abilities.

2. How is Autopiotherapy different from other forms of therapy?

Autopiotherapy differs from other forms of therapy in that it emphasizes the individual's ability to heal themselves, rather than relying solely on external interventions. It also combines both physical and mental approaches to healing, making it a holistic form of therapy.

3. Is Autopiotherapy considered a standard form of therapy?

No, Autopiotherapy is not considered a standard form of therapy. It is a relatively new approach and is not yet widely recognized or practiced by all healthcare professionals. However, it has shown promising results in treating various conditions and is gaining more recognition in the medical community.

4. What conditions can Autopiotherapy help with?

Autopiotherapy has been shown to be effective in treating a variety of conditions, including chronic pain, musculoskeletal issues, stress-related disorders, and neurological conditions. It can also be beneficial for overall wellness and promoting relaxation and self-awareness.

5. Is Autopiotherapy safe?

Yes, Autopiotherapy is generally considered safe when performed by a trained and certified practitioner. However, as with any form of therapy, there may be some risks involved, and it is important to consult with a healthcare professional before beginning any new treatment.

Similar threads

Physics Forums Privacy Policy
    • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
0
Views
94K
Programs How good is this applied math program?
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
2K
A syllabus of books/literature from calculus to group theory to QFTs
    • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
26
Views
17K
Requesting suggestions for languages, libraries, and architectures for parallel (and sometimes non parallel) numerical and scientific computations
    • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
8
Views
2K
News Bush Administration: My Indictment
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top