Calculating Average Velocity in Time Intervals from a Position vs Time Graph

In summary, the question was about finding the average velocity over a time interval from 1 to 5 seconds on a position vs time graph. The position at t=5 was given as 46.7m and the velocities at t=1 to t=3 and t=4.5 to t=5 were given as 20m/s and -26.7m/s, respectively. After trying a few times and getting different answers, the correct way to calculate the average velocity was to find the net displacement (46.7m - 20m = 26.7m) and divide it by the time elapsed (5-1 = 4s). This results in an average velocity of 6.7m
  • #1
jcsp101
Question: Find the average velocity over the time interval from 1 to 5 seconds. You will need to interpolate to find the position at time t=5 s . Do not simply eyeball the position or you will likely not be able to obtain the solution to the desired accuracy.

(Referring to attached graph: link http://i11.tinypic.com/6g4jl8i.jpg)


How do you find the Average Velocity in a time interval of a position vs time graph when the position rises then decreases?

some info from previous questions and work i did is as follows:
velocity from t=1 to t=3 is 20 m/s
position at t=5 is about 46.7 m
velocity from t=4.5 to t=4.5 is (i think) about -26.7 m/s

I tried a few times and got answers like 4.2 trying to average the time the velocity took in each part but it didnt work.


The question says to interpolate, but apparently i don't know how to do that the right way since I am gettin it wrong.


any ideas?
 

Attachments

  • M1K_av_0v1.jpg
    M1K_av_0v1.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 458
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
46.7 sounds right for the position at t=5. Can you show us your work for trying to calculate the average velocity?
 
  • #3
Well, i tried to add each segment and multiply it by how much space it took, so like this:

20*2+1.5*0+(-26.7*1.5)
------------------------
4

but that equals zero -.-, despite looking like itd give the average.
 
  • #4
The average velocity, which is a vector quantity, is the net displacement, divided by the time. Net being the important word.
 
  • #5
When you calculate the average velocity, you might want to break the data (position vs. time) into samples .5s apart (since your smallest increment is .5) and then you can take the instantaneous velocity over each .5s increment, add them together, and divide by the total number of increments.

an example:

from 1 to 1.5 seconds, position increases by 10 so V = 10m/.5s = 20 m/s
from 1.5 to 2 seconds...
 
  • #6
jcsp101 said:
Well, i tried to add each segment and multiply it by how much space it took, so like this:

20*2+1.5*0+(-26.7*1.5)
------------------------
4

but that equals zero -.-, despite looking like itd give the average.

I don't think 4 is enough. You're times segments are differently spaced and you're averaging over time, so you may want to add those coefficients that represent seconds together (2 + 1.5 + 1.5 = 5)

Why couldn't the average velocity be 0 anyway? I don't get exactly 0, by the way for that equation.
 
  • #7
ok, i did it with intervals of .5 and got like 3.33125 by dividing 26.65 by 8

but that's not right either according to the stupid online questionnnnn
AHFMKDFMNAS

thanks for the idea tho, maybe I am missing a large picture.
any ideas.
 
  • #8
Averaging the velocity I get 13.3 (1 second at 0, 2 seconds at 20, 1.5 seconds at 0 again, and 1.5 seconds at 80/3, over a total of 6 seconds). But if you calculate it considering the space you moved, then it is zero, as you finsih at the same point you started. Make sense?
 
  • #9
jcsp101 said:
ok, i did it with intervals of .5 and got like 3.33125 by dividing 26.65 by 8

but that's not right either according to the stupid online questionnnnn
AHFMKDFMNAS

thanks for the idea tho, maybe I am missing a large picture.
any ideas.

you would have had to solved for 5.5s that way which would have been an extra step unless you kind of summed over several intervals like I'm going to below:

what's the answer you're supposed to get?

When I do it the intervals way I get:

10 + 10 + 10 + 10 +0 + 0 + 0 - 1.5*40 = -20

and there's 10 samples there (three of them are in the 1.5)

so I get -20/10 = -2

EDIT: my bad, I added 5.5s and 6s samples in, but problem only asks 1 to 5...
 
  • #10
it doesn't say, its this online question for my class, tells you when you're right but otherwise no, with 5 tries and i have one last one, after trying -2 and my own answer.

btw, its the average from 1 to 5, not 0 to 6.
 
  • #11
jcsp101 said:
it doesn't say, its this online question for my class, tells you when you're right but otherwise no, with 5 tries and i have one last one, after trying -2 and my own answer.

btw, its the average from 1 to 5, not 0 to 6.

well, you got: 3.33125

but I get:

(10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 0 - 13.445)/8 = 3.319375 (which I don't like either)

and doing it your old way:

2*20 + 1.5*0 - .5*26.67 (I think you did 1.5 here the first time)

= 40 - 13.335 = 26.67

and there's four seconds involved so:

26.67/4 = 6.67

I'd trust your way because I see an inconsistency in my way now. You just have to do your way right and not include the last second like you did in your first calculation.
 
  • #12
You're making more complicated than it needs to be.

The definition of average velocity is net displacement divided by time. What is the net displacement from position 1 to position 5? Divide that by 5-1 = 4 seconds. That's your answer.
 
  • #13
"You're making more complicated than it needs to be.

The definition of average velocity is net displacement divided by time. What is the net displacement from position 1 to position 5? Divide that by 5-1 = 4 seconds. That's your answer."

so wait, itd be zero? cause it goes back to the same place, so 0/4 would be zero.
that sounds too sumple tho; but i doubt its that since it says round to 2 sig figs.

i just tried 6.7 (2 sig figs) as my last attempt and it worked, althought i don't get why you divide 26.67 by 4 and not the total number or intervals. however, 6.7 is the right answer.

either way, thanks guys.
if you can explain that little thing tho itd be helpful.
 
  • #14
average velocity = net displacement/time elapsed

The net displacement from 1s to 5s is 46.7m - 20m = 26.7m (just subtract the positions).

time elapsed is 5-1 = 4s.

26.7/4 = 6.7m/s
 
Last edited:
  • #15
or, draw a v-t graph,
find area below the cruve(net distance), and divide it by 6
 
  • #16
nah wait i got it, i put 1.5 instead of .5 for the last velocity when i was interpolating, there we gooo.

thanks guys.
 

1. How do you calculate average velocity from a position vs time graph?

To calculate average velocity, you need to find the slope of the line on the position vs time graph. This can be done by dividing the change in position by the change in time between two points on the graph. The formula for average velocity is: average velocity = (final position - initial position) / (final time - initial time)

2. Can you calculate average velocity from a curved position vs time graph?

Yes, you can calculate average velocity from a curved position vs time graph by finding the slope of the tangent line at a specific point on the curve. This will give you the instantaneous velocity at that point, and you can repeat this process for multiple points on the graph to find the average velocity.

3. What is the unit for average velocity?

The unit for average velocity is distance over time, typically expressed as meters per second (m/s) in the metric system or feet per second (ft/s) in the imperial system.

4. How is average velocity different from instantaneous velocity?

Average velocity is the overall rate of change in position over a specific time interval, while instantaneous velocity is the rate of change at a specific moment in time. Average velocity takes into account the entire journey, while instantaneous velocity only tells you the speed and direction at one point.

5. Can average velocity be negative?

Yes, average velocity can be negative if the object is moving in the opposite direction of the positive direction on the position vs time graph. This indicates that the object is changing position in a negative direction, but it does not necessarily mean it is moving backwards. It could just mean that the object is slowing down or changing direction.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
873
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
350
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
955
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
865
Back
Top