- #1

- 47

- 1

My question is: Is this an appropriate way to get the overall average velocity of the object over three trials. Wouldn't it be better to average the times and do distance over time with the average times?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Gersty
- Start date

- #1

- 47

- 1

My question is: Is this an appropriate way to get the overall average velocity of the object over three trials. Wouldn't it be better to average the times and do distance over time with the average times?

- #2

mfb

Mentor

- 35,803

- 12,529

If your variation comes from something else, it depends on the setup.

- #3

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 26,989

- 5,785

Imagine that there is a wide variation in instantaneous velocity and that you do one measurement over a long interval and two others over very short intervals. The single average over a long interval will have reduced the error considerably but the two extra measurements could be well adrift and they could distort the overall answer out of all proportion with their significance if you take a mean of the means..

- #4

256bits

Gold Member

- 3,538

- 1,552

Gersty

The two methods give different results - one is correct, and one is not, depending upon the setup.

If you are measuring the time to travel a set distance, then the trial times are averaged before calculating the average velocity from the distance / time(avg). The average of the velocities of the trials gives the incorrect result.

If you are measuring the distance travelled in a set time, then the trial distances are averaged before calculating the average velocity from distance(avg) / time. Or in this case you could calculate each trial velocity and average all the trials.

The problem is often asked as follows.

A car travels 60 mph for 1 hour and 30 mph for one hour, what is the average velocity?

Ans, 45 mph. [ 60 miles + 30 miles ) / 2 hours ].

. Or [ ( 60 mph + 30 mph ) / 2 = 45 mph ] with velocity averages.

Which is not the same as; ( this is your experiment )

A car travels 60 miles in one hour and 60 miles in 2 hours, what is the average velocity?

Ans: 40 mph - total distance / total time

. ie [ (60 miles + 60 miles ) / 3 hours ].

Or : 40 mph - by averaging velocities for equal set time intervals

. ie .60, 30, and 30 mph each for 1 hour Avg = ( 60+30+30 ) / 3 = 40 mph

Or : 40 mph - set distance / average time

. ie avg time = 1 hour + 2 hour = 1.5 hour

. Set distance ( 60 miles ) / avg time ( 1.5 hours ) = 40 mph

The two methods give different results - one is correct, and one is not, depending upon the setup.

If you are measuring the time to travel a set distance, then the trial times are averaged before calculating the average velocity from the distance / time(avg). The average of the velocities of the trials gives the incorrect result.

If you are measuring the distance travelled in a set time, then the trial distances are averaged before calculating the average velocity from distance(avg) / time. Or in this case you could calculate each trial velocity and average all the trials.

The problem is often asked as follows.

A car travels 60 mph for 1 hour and 30 mph for one hour, what is the average velocity?

Ans, 45 mph. [ 60 miles + 30 miles ) / 2 hours ].

. Or [ ( 60 mph + 30 mph ) / 2 = 45 mph ] with velocity averages.

Which is not the same as; ( this is your experiment )

A car travels 60 miles in one hour and 60 miles in 2 hours, what is the average velocity?

Ans: 40 mph - total distance / total time

. ie [ (60 miles + 60 miles ) / 3 hours ].

Or : 40 mph - by averaging velocities for equal set time intervals

. ie .60, 30, and 30 mph each for 1 hour Avg = ( 60+30+30 ) / 3 = 40 mph

Or : 40 mph - set distance / average time

. ie avg time = 1 hour + 2 hour = 1.5 hour

. Set distance ( 60 miles ) / avg time ( 1.5 hours ) = 40 mph

Last edited:

Share: