Axially loaded member problem

[whynot314]

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130909_125150_zpse5d4c881.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130909_125150_zpse5d4c881.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]

I am not sure how to go beyond this point or even if I have the compatibility problem correct, I am assuming that the bar does hit the other side of the wall. But when I go to solve this I have to many unknowns.

[URL=http://s1341.photobucket.com/user/nebula-314/media/20130909_123600_zps3c277e60.jpg.html][PLAIN]http://i1341.photobucket.com/albums/o745/nebula-314/20130909_123600_zps3c277e60.jpg[/URL][/PLAIN]

 

[whynot314]

Also because the steel rod is bonded to the aluminum rod i figured that member BC would have the same displacement, thus giving me F(al)=F(st)($\frac{A(al)}{A(st)}$)($\frac{E(al)}{E(st)}$). Using this I was able to get an answer but it was wrong.

 

[whynot314]

Note equation of deformation is $\delta$=$\frac{PL}{AE}$.

 

[PhanthomJay]

Did you solve for the first part correctly (Question 4-41)? The top alum piece, and the bottom steel piece, and the bottom alum piece, all have the same axial deformations. Using your deformation equations for each, and Newton's 1st law, gives you 4 equations with 4 unknowns, which you can solve for the forces and deformation.

In the next question 4-42, you can solve for the applied force and internal forces necessary to deform all 3 pieces equally at 5 mm each, using the same approach, but considering the bottom al-steel end free to move without deformation. Now if the applied force turns out less than 400 N to give this 5 mm deformation, then the remaining force (400 - the applied force you calculated) should be used similar to the first question to get the additional forces in the sections.

 

[rezeew]

I understand that solving complex problems can be challenging and may require multiple steps and assumptions. In this case, the axially loaded member problem appears to have multiple unknowns and may require further analysis to determine a solution.

One approach to solving this problem could be to make some assumptions, such as assuming that the bar does hit the other side of the wall, and then using equations and principles of mechanics to solve for the unknowns. However, it is important to note that these assumptions may not accurately reflect the real-world scenario and could lead to errors in the solution.

Another approach could be to gather more data or information, such as the dimensions and properties of the bar and the wall, to create a more accurate and detailed model of the problem. This could help to reduce the number of unknowns and make the solution more reliable.

In any case, it is important to carefully consider all assumptions and data used in the solution process and to validate the results through experimentation or comparison with other methods. As a scientist, it is crucial to approach problems with a critical and analytical mindset to ensure accurate and reliable solutions.