Axis of rotation

  • #1
aniket7tomar
10
0
Does a body rotating about an axis also rotate about any other axis?
Eg. Cars on a racetrack may be rotating about a vertical axis passing through the centre of the track but can they also be considered to be rotating about a vertical axis passing through the spectators' stand?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
mathman
Science Advisor
8,065
542
Specific question - no. In general the terms rotate and revolve have different meanings. The earth rotates about the axis defined by the north and south poles. The earth revolves around the sun.
 
  • #3
aniket7tomar
10
0
I think you misunderstood the question or i am unable to understand the reply....
What i asked was that in the fig. If body b is rotating about axis aa' then can we say that there can be an axis mm' parallel to aa' about which the body's motion can be described as rotation?
Can that happen with any axis parallel to aa'?
 

Attachments

  • 1391807980468.jpg
    1391807980468.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 442
  • #4
UltrafastPED
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,914
216
The moment of inertia will be different if you change the axis of rotation.

But while a moving body will have angular momentum wrt any stationary line, it will only have one instantaneous axis of rotation - this is the axis for which every element of the body has the same angular acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
Philip Wood
Gold Member
1,221
78
I was going to say that if a rigid body is rotating about an axis, then each point on the body remains the same distance from the axis. Surely this can be the case only with a single axis.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
aniket7tomar
10
0
I was under the impression that i understood your answer but then later i thought about how when a disc is rolling 'purely' we can consider it to be rotating about an instantaneous axis passing through the pt. in contact with the ground as well as a moving instantaneous axis through the centre of mass?
Pls. tell
 
  • #7
Philip Wood
Gold Member
1,221
78
a7t: I see what you mean. My post exemplifies fools rushing in where angels fear to tread. I'd say that the instantaneous rotation axis was the line of contact with the ground, but it is certainly true that the velocity of each point on the disc can be constructed by adding a constant 'forward' velocity to a velocity due to rotation about a stationary axis through the centre of the disc. Nonetheless, in our ordinary frame of reference, I'd say it was not correct to claim that the disc is rotating about its centre. I suspect this is controversial. Let's hope you get more replies to your interesting question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #8
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,450
687
I think you misunderstood the question or i am unable to understand the reply....
What i asked was that in the fig. If body b is rotating about axis aa' then can we say that there can be an axis mm' parallel to aa' about which the body's motion can be described as rotation?
Yes.

You can pick any arbitrary point on (or even off of) the body and describe the 6 DOF motion of the body as a combination of translational motion of that selected point plus rotational motion about an axis that passes through that point.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #9
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,450
687
A couple of specific examples:

1. A lever rotating about a pivot point, or a door that opens on a hinge. Here there is a fixed point (or set of fixed points) on the rotating object that doesn't undergo translation. It oftentimes make more sense to describe the behavior in terms of pure rotation about this fixed point than describing it in terms of translation of the center of mass and rotation about the center of mass. If you do the latter, you need to add constraint forces / constraint torques to the description so as to keep the fixed point fixed.

2. A rocket that goes from a vertical orientation on the ground to a horizontal orientation ten minutes later, in the process expelling 95% of its mass. With a center of mass description, you need to account for the fact that the center of mass moves within the rocket if you want to accurately model where that rocket will be after that ten minutes. There are different uglinesses that come into play a fixed point description (e.g., translation of / rotation about the nose of the rocket).
 

Suggested for: Axis of rotation

Replies
9
Views
400
Replies
10
Views
390
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
806
Replies
2
Views
427
Replies
12
Views
388
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
28
Views
457
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
40
Views
816
Replies
7
Views
504
Top