Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B-Bbar mixing and CKM matrix

  1. Mar 15, 2013 #1
    Hi all,

    I'm being a bit thick in following some introductory lectures on the Standard Model: http://hepwww.rl.ac.uk/hepsummerschool/Teubner- Standard Model 2008.pdf

    The thing I'm struggling to understand is the treatment of how "box" diagrams contribute to B-Bbar mixing (see page 70 of that link). My attempt to understand it would be the following. The box diagram adds terms that couple B, Bbar to the effective Hamiltonian, so that the mass matrix becomes of the form
    [tex]\left(\begin{array} \
    M_{B} & \Delta M \\
    (\Delta M )^* & M_{B} \end{array} \right) [/tex]
    where [itex]\Delta M \sim (V_{tb}V_{td}^{*})^2[/itex] is the complex contribution from the box diagram. The eigenvalues of this matrix sum to [itex]2 M_B[/itex] and their product is [itex]M_{B}^2-|\Delta M |^2=(M_B - |\Delta M|)(M_B + |\Delta M|)[/itex]. So define [itex] \Delta m =2 |\Delta M|[/itex], and the eigenvalues of this matrix must be [itex]M_B \pm \frac{1}{2} \Delta m[/itex].
    where the minus sign corresponds to the heavy mass eigenstate and the plus sign to the lighter eigenstate (because [itex](A-\lambda I)v=0[/itex]).
    The eigenvectors of this matrix should then lie in the kernel of
    [tex]\left(\begin{array} \
    \mp |\Delta M| & \Delta M \\
    (\Delta M )^* & \mp |\Delta M| \end{array} \right) [/tex]
    If, for a moment, we take [itex] \Delta M [/itex] to be real, I then think that the heavy normalised eigenstate is [itex](\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex] and the lighter one is [itex](\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}},-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})[/itex], which is the other way round to what the notes suggest. This is problem number one that I have. (Does [\itex] \Delta M [/itex] turn out to be negative or something?)

    Problem number two is that if I write [itex]\Delta M= |\Delta M|e^{i \alpha}[/itex], so that [itex]\alpha[/itex] is the phase of the box diagram, then I think my mass eigenstates are solutions of
    [tex]|\Delta M| \left(\begin{array} \
    \mp 1 & e^{i \alpha} \\
    e^{-i \alpha} & \mp 1\end{array} \right) \left(\begin{array} \ p \\ q \end{array} \right)=0 [/tex]
    so that normalised eigenvectors will look like [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(1,\pm e^{i \alpha})[/itex]
    -i.e. that the phase of the diagram is the ratio p/q. But according to the notes, p/q is the square root of the phase of the diagram. What am I doing wrong?

    Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: B-Bbar mixing and CKM matrix
  1. CKM Matrix (Replies: 10)

  2. Unitarity of CKM matrix (Replies: 11)

  3. CKM matrix parameters (Replies: 11)

  4. CKM Matrix (Replies: 12)

Loading...