Baby Rudin Problem 2.7

  • Thread starter julypraise
  • Start date
  • #1
julypraise
110
0

Homework Statement



I've proved that if [itex] B = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_{i} [/itex] then [itex] \overline{B} = \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} \overline{A_{i}} [/itex] but it should not be right. So could you find errors on my reasoning?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Observe [tex] x \in \overline{B} [/tex]

iff for every [tex] \epsilon>0 \quad B(x;\epsilon) \cap B \neq \emptyset [/tex]

iff [tex] B(x;\epsilon) \cap \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_{i} \neq \emptyset [/tex]

iff [tex] B(x;\epsilon) \cap A_{i_{0}} \neq \emptyset [/tex] for some [itex] i_{0} \in \mathbb{Z}^{+}[/itex]

iff [tex] x \in \overline{A_{i_{0}}} [/tex]

iff [tex] x \in \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} \overline{A_{i}} [/tex]
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
369
Your fourth iff is wrong.

it should be if $x \in \bar{A_i_0}$ then $B(x,\epsilon)\cap A_{i_0}$.

I mean if $B(x,\epsilon) \cap A_{i_0}$ \forall \epsilon >0, x can still be outside of A_{i_0}.

Take another set such A_j such that x is in it but not in A_i_0 but they intersect each other, and such that whatever nbhd of x we pick it intersects A_i_0.
 
  • #3
julypraise
110
0
Your fourth iff is wrong.

it should be if $x \in \bar{A_i_0}$ then $B(x,\epsilon)\cap A_{i_0}$.

I mean if $B(x,\epsilon) \cap A_{i_0}$ \forall \epsilon >0, x can still be outside of A_{i_0}.

Take another set such A_j such that x is in it but not in A_i_0 but they intersect each other, and such that whatever nbhd of x we pick it intersects A_i_0.

Oh yeah. I think I know what you mean. i_{0} depends on epsilon. Thanks.
 

Suggested for: Baby Rudin Problem 2.7

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
510
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
335
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
604
Replies
28
Views
192
Replies
6
Views
159
Replies
1
Views
278
Replies
2
Views
114
Replies
2
Views
239
Top