Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Bad Particle Physics Glossary

  1. Apr 6, 2010 #1

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Just when you think you've read enough bad physics reporting in the mass media, along comes Reuters and lowers the bar even further down.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62T1EQ20100330

    I'm really puzzled by how they can let something like this through, considering that one can easily google many of these things and find out such mistakes or rather poor definitions to some of these terms.

    Zz.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 6, 2010 #2

    dx

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    This one is especially rediculous:

    "STANDARD PRINCIPLE - The standard theory of modern physics, based on two other theories -- general relativity and quantum mechanics. Its main weakness is that it cannot yet fully describe gravity or mass."
     
  4. Apr 6, 2010 #3

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    "Protons and electrons are types of hadrons." :rolleyes:
     
  5. Apr 6, 2010 #4

    rhody

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Just a guess, but with tight deadines, poor edit, quality control, you get a bad product.

    Phrases like:
    scream high school or college intern to me, combine that with lackadasical review and you get what you see in the article.

    I followed the link to the blog page of the editor, David Stamp, see http://www.reuters.com/article/idUS...eedName=everything&virtualBrandChannel=11563".
    Sample from the RSS Feed below:

    More bad examples. This speaks volumes, at least to me. Shame on Reuter's management for letting this happen.

    Rhody...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  6. Apr 6, 2010 #5
    Well, I'd give you my opinion, but after a few lines my vision was obscured by my own tears of blood... :cry:

    "Protons and electrons are types of hadrons."

    That's just plain upsetting! :tongue2:
     
  7. Apr 6, 2010 #6

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Maybe the writer meant Protons and Neutrons. >_>

    I really hope the writer meant Protons and Neutrons...
     
  8. Apr 6, 2010 #7

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Of course I'm more sensitive to their errors on biological topics, but when such easily researched topics are so badly mangled, I have a hard time believing anything these news sources publish anymore. While politicians are no rocket surgeons, how do we know the reporters even get the political stories right when they can't even fact check something that is a LOT more based on facts than opinions?
     
  9. Apr 6, 2010 #8
    Ya know, I always find these kinds of mistakes in the media. But seeing how they present this information the masses, and most people dont even know what an electron IS, I applaud them for even trying, even if they fail miserably!
     
  10. Apr 6, 2010 #9

    Matterwave

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Yea, I don't think politicians are anything like Dr. Tenma.
     
  11. Apr 7, 2010 #10

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    But in this case, not giving out any information is better than giving out the wrong information.

    Zz.
     
  12. Apr 7, 2010 #11
    In this case it would be kinder to give the reader a "dual hemispherectomy" and get it over with than to essentially empower *explative deleted* "people" such as Chopra. *wince*
     
  13. Apr 7, 2010 #12
    "KNOWN UNIVERSE - The planets, stars and entire galaxies that give out light and can be seen from Earth -- but which scientists say account for only 5 percent of everything in the universe."

    Ow.

    "DARK MATTER - Invisible matter that scientists believe makes up some 25 percent of the universe and whose presumed existence accounts for how the trajectories through of visible stars and galaxies are bent."

    This doesn't even make coherent grammatical sense, notwithstanding the jumble of concepts.

    Compare with my recent comment on a one paragraph squib on the LHC. Reuters seems to have a particular inability to deliver science journalism.

    diogenesNY
     
  14. Apr 7, 2010 #13

    Gokul43201

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Ack! :yuck: This is the pits!
     
  15. Apr 7, 2010 #14
    Good lord, fetch a doctor (NOT a physicist... lol) or a rabbi or a priest or SOMETHING!... this junk has turned Gokul into Bill The Cat!!! "Ack, Ack Thpppbbt!". :wink:

    That said, I kind of felt like hacking up a hairball of misery when I add DiogenesNY's Rueter's quotes to ZapperZ.

    We have an internet! We have this wonderful "series of tubes", so why the hell don't people try to use it for more than porn, misinformation and hate speech?! (yes, I'm exaggerating... a little...)
     
  16. Apr 7, 2010 #15

    Moonbear

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    :rofl: Great visual! :rofl:
     
  17. Apr 7, 2010 #16
    You are too kind Moonbear. :) naaaaah, you're right, it was good! :biggrin:

    Kidding aside, lets all hear it for Bloom County!
     
  18. Apr 16, 2010 #17

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Hey, see how many errors and inaccuracies you can find out of THIS one!

    http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/What+name+Large+Hadron+Collider+could+reveal+origins/2910326/story.html [Broken]

    It's not as bad as the previous one, but again, any good undergraduate physics student could spot and point out these errors easily. These news agencies could do well by hiring these students very cheaply and get them to do some copy editing.

    Hey, we could turn this "spot the mistake" into a nice little educational game! :)

    Zz.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  19. Apr 16, 2010 #18
    Ohhh.... that just hurts. I can't wait until the LHC reveals a solution to violence and inhumanity! :cry:

    One good turn deserves another...

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071224010814AAt3fEc

    Enjoy! I recommend having a stained hankey to wipe away bloody tears and sputum (I know I needed it). Don't worry btw, I also found that my heart started beating again after a minute or two.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  20. Apr 16, 2010 #19
    It was published just before April 1, though.
     
  21. Apr 16, 2010 #20
    No errors http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/parodies/sam/sam.html" [Broken]

    :biggrin:
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Bad Particle Physics Glossary
  1. Bad Physics in movies. (Replies: 22)

  2. Bad Movie Physics (Replies: 21)

Loading...