Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Balls of Gas aren't Planets

  1. Sep 6, 2006 #1
    When is a Planet a planet...?

    and when is it just a ball of gas..?

    My personal belief is that Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus...should NOT be considered planets.

    How can you call a spheroid ball of rotating gases a planet ?

    Surely, if you can't step on it, land on it or float on it...its not a planet..

    So for what its worth my definition of a Planet would any object that is..

    A. Solid cored.

    B. Spherical

    C. In an circular or as close to circular orbit around a Sun.

    D. Not in orbit around another planet.

    E. Is not a failed or collapsed star or proto-star..

    F. Is not a ball of gas with a liquid core...


    So...maybe..(since we're tossing out Pluto)...we should also give Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune the flick...

    I stress, this is a personal definition.

    In anycase, i'd like to read other peoples POV's... on this..

    Cheers

    Aquafire
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 6, 2006 #2

    EL

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I don't really care wheter there are five, or eight, or fiftyseven planets. It's just a matter of definition.
    It think this discussion is kind of awkward for the scientific community.
     
  4. Sep 6, 2006 #3

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    First, Jupiter does likely have a solid core and if it doesn't, it's only because it is so hot it is liquid.

    But that's besides the point: you most certainly can float on Jupiter, just like you can float either on the earth's ocean or in its atmosphere depending on your buoyancy.

    Also, why? Why do you choose these criteria? They seem arbitrary to me. (not that other defnitions wouldn't be...)
     
  5. Sep 6, 2006 #4

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Something else I forgot - gas giants are already labeled as "gas giants" - as opposed to "terrestrial" planets.
     
  6. Sep 7, 2006 #5
    Those are my thoughts as well, although I disagree with letter D, and I'm unsure about letter C.
     
  7. Sep 8, 2006 #6

    Astronuc

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    As Russ pointed out, Jupiter is believed to have a solid core, probably metallic hydrogen.

    Is not a valid criterion. But as Russ also indicated, there are giant planets with a lot of gas or liquid, which are composed mainly hydrogen, methane, ammonia, . . . and there are 'rocky', or terrestrial planets.

    JUPITER AND SATURN EVOLUTION BY GAS ACCRETION ONTO A SOLID CORE pdf - use 'save target as'

    Then there is the matter of the giant exoplanets which are periodically discovered which are Jupiter-sized or larger, or Neptune-sized.

    Giant Planets Orbiting Faraway Stars - http://astro.berkeley.edu/~gmarcy/0398marcy.html

    Also, if a person tried to land on Venus, he/she would be 'cooked' pretty quickly. As for Mars, one has to take one's oxygen to breath and one would need an artificial environment in order to survive.

    Definitions are perhaps arbitrary and should be as simple as possible.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2006
  8. Sep 8, 2006 #7
    We know the sun is orbiting the galaxy's center. Is it also spinning?
     
  9. Sep 8, 2006 #8

    Yes .
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Balls of Gas aren't Planets
  1. Gas planets (Replies: 9)

  2. Jupiter gas planet? (Replies: 2)

Loading...