Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Cosmology
BAO : Relation between redshift, Hubble constant and radial
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="fab13, post: 6040615, member: 183596"] From this link [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_acoustic_oscillations#Measured_observables_of_dark_energy[/URL] , I can't get this relation : ##c\Delta z = H(z)\Delta \chi\quad\quad(1)## with ##z## redshift, ##H(z)## Hubble constant at redshift = ##z## and ##\chi## radial coordinates. One starts from angle of object ##\Delta \theta## which is equal to the ration : ##\Delta\theta = \dfrac{\Delta\chi}{\text{d}_{a}(z)}\quad\quad(2)## with ##\text{d}_{a}(z)## the angular diameter distance at redshift=##z##. It is indicated also on this page the relation for angular diameter distance ##\text{d}_a(z)##: ##\text{d}_a(z)\propto \int_{0}^{z}\dfrac{\text{d}z'}{H(z')}\quad\quad(3)## Actually, I know that ##\text{d}_a(z)## is expressed as a function of cosmological horizon ##\text{d}_{h}(z)## and redshift ##z## like this : ##\text{d}_{a}=\dfrac{\text{d}_{h}(z)}{1+z}\quad\quad(4)## with ##\text{d}_{h}(z)=c\int_{0}^{z}\dfrac{\text{d}z}{H(z)}\quad\quad(5)## So from ##eq(5)##, what I can only write is (by considering a little ##\Delta## and a curvature parameter ##\Omega_{k}=0##) : ##c\Delta z=\text{d}_{h}(z)H(z)\quad\quad(6)## Now, taking the expression of ##\text{d}_{h}(z)## into ##eq(6)## : ##c\Delta z=\text{d}_{a}(z)(1+z)H(z)\quad\quad(7)## Then : ##c\Delta z=\dfrac{\Delta\chi}{\Delta\theta}(1+z)H(z)\quad\quad(8)## As you can see in ##eq(8)##, this is not the same form as in ##eq(1)##. How can I make disappear the factor ##(1+z) /\Delta\theta## in order to have simply for the right member : ##H(z)\Delta \chi## instead of ##\dfrac{\Delta\chi}{\Delta\theta}(1+z)H(z)## into ##eq(8)## ? ##\Delta\chi## represents for me the variation ##\Delta## of radial coordinate, doesn't it ? Any help is welcome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Astronomy and Cosmology
Cosmology
BAO : Relation between redshift, Hubble constant and radial
Back
Top